Literature DB >> 1511639

Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in predicting pathologic stage of rectal cancer before and after preoperative radiation therapy.

J W Fleshman1, R J Myerson, R D Fry, I J Kodner.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and CT scan staging of rectal cancers before, and TRUS staging after, 45 Gy of irradiation were compared with the pathologic stage of the resected specimen in 19 patients. Accuracy of TRUS before and after irradiation, and of CT scan before irradiation, was 32 percent, 63 percent, and 53 percent, respectively. CT scan before and TRUS after irradiation predicted lymph node involvement in 79 percent and 68 percent of cases, respectively. Positive predictive value for lymph node involvement before irradiation was 60 percent for CT scan and 37.5 percent for TRUS; after irradiation, it was 50 percent for TRUS. Negative predictive value was 100 percent for CT scan and TRUS before radiation and 88 percent for TRUS after irradiation. Preoperative radiation therapy makes TRUS and CT scan less effective as staging techniques. The absence of lymph nodes on TRUS and CT scan before and after irradiation is reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511639     DOI: 10.1007/bf02047866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in staging locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Zoran Radovanovic; M Breberina; T Petrovic; A Golubovic; D Radovanovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  James Walter Fleshman Jr., MD: a conversation with the editor.

Authors:  James W Fleshman; William C Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-07

3.  Predicting tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation using clinical parameters in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chan Ho Park; Hee Cheol Kim; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Young Suk Park; Doo Ho Choi; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jacopo Martellucci; M Scheiterle; B Lorenzi; F Roviello; F Cetta; E Pinto; G Tanzini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Lorren R Mattingly-Wells; Jorge E Marcet; Brenna C McMahon Waldschmidt; John W Cromwell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice.

Authors:  G S Rozycki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ali A Siddiqui; Yomi Fayiga; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-18

8.  Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ram Dickman; Yulia Kundel; Rachel Levy-Drummer; Ofer Purim; Nir Wasserberg; Eyal Fenig; Aaron Sulkes; Baruch Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Exploratory Study to Identify Radiomics Classifiers for Lung Cancer Histology.

Authors:  Weimiao Wu; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; John Quackenbush; Philippe Lambin; Johan Bussink; Raymond Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.