Literature DB >> 24996795

Liver perfusion in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI): comparison of enhancement in Gd-BT-DO3A and Gd-EOB-DTPA in normal liver parenchyma.

Hanke J Schalkx1, Marijn van Stralen, Kenneth Coenegrachts, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Charlotte S van Kessel, Richard van Hillegersberg, Karel J van Erpecum, Helena M Verkooijen, Josien P W Pluim, Wouter B Veldhuis, Maarten S van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Within-patient comparison of the enhancement patterns of normal liver parenchyma after gadobutrol and gadoxetate disodium, with emphasis on the start of hepatocytic uptake of gadoxetate disodium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (12 female, 9 male) without chronic liver disease underwent 1.5-T contrast-enhanced MRI twice, once with an extracellular contrast agent (gadobutrol) and once with a hepatospecific agent (gadoxetate disodium), using a T1-weighted keyhole sequence. Fifteen whole-liver datasets were acquired up to 5 min for both contrast agents and two additional datasets, up to 20 min, for gadoxetate. Signal intensities (SI) of the parenchyma, aorta and portal vein were measured and analysed relative to pre-contrast parenchymal SI.
RESULTS: After gadoxetate, in 29% of the patients the parenchymal SI decreased by ≥5% after the initial vascular-phase-induced peak, while in the other 71% the parenchymal SI remained stable or gradually increased until up to 20 min after the initial peak. The hepatocytic gadoxetate uptake started at a mean of 37.8 s (SD 14.7 s) and not later than 76 s after left ventricle enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Parenchymal enhancement due to hepatocytic uptake of gadoxetate can start as early as in the late arterial phase. This may confound the assessment of lesion appearance as compared to extracellular contrast such as gadobutrol. KEY POINTS: Gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI results in early enhancement of normal parenchyma in patients The start of the hepatobiliary phase coincides with the late arterial phase. This may confound the assessment of lesion appearance compared to extracellular contrast. Different parenchymal enhancement patterns after gadoxetate were found for normal parenchyma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996795     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3275-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Martin Rohrer; Hans Bauer; Jan Mintorovitch; Martin Requardt; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Scott K Nagle; Sharon L D'Souza; Karl K Vigen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Contrast-enhanced timing robust acquisition order with a preparation of the longitudinal signal component (CENTRA plus) for 3D contrast-enhanced abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Gabriele M Beck; Jan De Becker; Alun C Jones; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Winfried A Willinek; Jürgen Gieseke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study.

Authors:  O Dahlqvist Leinhard; N Dahlström; J Kihlberg; P Sandström; T B Brismar; O Smedby; P Lundberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Kristina I Ringe; Daniela B Husarik; Claude B Sirlin; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Irene Cruite; Michael Schroeder; Elmar M Merkle; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with GD-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  A S Purysko; E M Remer; J C Veniero
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  "Pseudo washout" sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor.

Authors:  Kyung Won Doo; Chang Hee Lee; Jae Woong Choi; Jongmee Lee; Kyeong Ah Kim; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Delay before the hepatocyte phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: is it possible to shorten the examination time?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Licht Tominaga; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Shintaro Ichikawa; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Katsuyoshi Ito; Teruki Sone; Akira Yamamoto; Koji Yoshida; Koki Kakuba; Daigo Tanimoto; Hiroki Higashi; Takenori Yamashita
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver (Including Biliary Contrast Agents) Part 1: Technical Considerations and Contrast Materials.

Authors:  A Agostini; M F Kircher; R Do; A Borgheresi; S Monti; A Giovagnoni; L Mannelli
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonanance Imaging of the Liver (Including Biliary Contrast Agents)-Part 2: Protocols for Liver Magnetic Resonanance Imaging and Characterization of Common Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Moritz F Kircher; Richard K G Do; Alessandra Borgheresi; Serena Monti; Andrea Giovagnoni; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 0.800

3.  Exercise-induced calf muscle hyperemia: quantitative mapping with low-dose dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Gwenael Layec; Christopher Hanrahan; Christopher C Conlin; Corey Hart; Nan Hu; Lillian Khor; Michelle Mueller; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Quantification of liver function using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Sarah Poetter-Lang; Nina Bastati; Alina Messner; Antonia Kristic; Alexander Herold; Jacqueline C Hodge; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-09

5.  Qualitative assessment of EOB-GD-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A MR contrast studies in HCC patients and colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Francesca Maio; Antonio Avallone; Guglielmo Nasti; Raffaele Palaia; Vittorio Albino; Roberto Grassi; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.965

6.  Acute changes in liver tumour perfusion measured non-invasively with arterial spin labelling.

Authors:  S Peter Johnson; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Jack A Wells; Mathew Robson; Vineeth Rajkumar; Mark F Lythgoe; R Barbara Pedley; Simon Walker-Samuel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.