Jonathan C Hooker1, Gavin Hamilton1, Charlie C Park1, Steven Liao1, Tanya Wolfson2, Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy1, Cheng William Hong1, Adrija Mamidipalli1, Anthony Gamst2, Rohit Loomba3, Claude B Sirlin4. 1. Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92093-0888, USA. 2. Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC), University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. 3. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. 4. Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92093-0888, USA. csirlin@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the inter-reader agreement of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and its longitudinal change in a clinical trial of adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). STUDY TYPE: We performed a secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of a bile acid sequestrant in 45 adults with NASH. A six-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo magnitude-based fat quantification technique was performed at 3 T. Three independent readers measured MRI-PDFF by placing one primary and two additional regions of interest (ROIs) in each segment at both time points. Cross-sectional agreement between the three readers was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CV). Additionally, we used Bland-Altman analyses to examine pairwise agreement between the three readers at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and for longitudinal change. RESULTS: Using all ROIs by all readers, mean PDFF at baseline, at EOT, and mean change in PDFF was 16.1%, 16.0%, and 0.07%, respectively. The 27-ROI PDFF measurements had 0.998 ICC and 1.8% CV at baseline, 0.998 ICC and 1.8% CV at EOT, and 0.997 ICC for longitudinal change. The 9-ROI PDFF measurements had corresponding values of 0.997 and 2.6%, 0.996 and 2.4%, and 0.994. Using 27 ROIs, the magnitude of the bias between readers for whole-liver PDFF measurement ranged from 0.03% to 0.06% points at baseline, 0.01% to 0.07% points at EOT, and 0.01% to 0.02% points for longitudinal change. CONCLUSION: Inter-reader agreement for measuring whole-liver PDFF and its longitudinal change is high. 9-ROI measurements have only slightly lower agreement than 27-ROI measurements.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine the inter-reader agreement of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and its longitudinal change in a clinical trial of adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). STUDY TYPE: We performed a secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of a bile acid sequestrant in 45 adults with NASH. A six-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo magnitude-based fat quantification technique was performed at 3 T. Three independent readers measured MRI-PDFF by placing one primary and two additional regions of interest (ROIs) in each segment at both time points. Cross-sectional agreement between the three readers was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CV). Additionally, we used Bland-Altman analyses to examine pairwise agreement between the three readers at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and for longitudinal change. RESULTS: Using all ROIs by all readers, mean PDFF at baseline, at EOT, and mean change in PDFF was 16.1%, 16.0%, and 0.07%, respectively. The 27-ROI PDFF measurements had 0.998 ICC and 1.8% CV at baseline, 0.998 ICC and 1.8% CV at EOT, and 0.997 ICC for longitudinal change. The 9-ROI PDFF measurements had corresponding values of 0.997 and 2.6%, 0.996 and 2.4%, and 0.994. Using 27 ROIs, the magnitude of the bias between readers for whole-liver PDFF measurement ranged from 0.03% to 0.06% points at baseline, 0.01% to 0.07% points at EOT, and 0.01% to 0.02% points for longitudinal change. CONCLUSION: Inter-reader agreement for measuring whole-liver PDFF and its longitudinal change is high. 9-ROI measurements have only slightly lower agreement than 27-ROI measurements.
Entities:
Keywords:
Inter-reader agreement; Liver; Proton density fat fraction (PDFF); Quantitative imaging biomarker; Region of interest; Reproducibility
Authors: Nathan S Artz; William M Haufe; Catherine A Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Guilherme M Campos; Anthony C Gamst; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Geraldine H Kang; Irene Cruite; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Avishkar Tyagi; Omid Yeganeh; Yakir Levin; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin C Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Amir K Zand; Elhamy Heba; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey Schwimmer; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2015-10
Authors: Z Permutt; T-A Le; M R Peterson; E Seki; D A Brenner; C Sirlin; R Loomba Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Mazen Noureddin; Jessica Lam; Michael R Peterson; Michael Middleton; Gavin Hamilton; Thuy-Anh Le; Ricki Bettencourt; Chris Changchien; David A Brenner; Claude Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Michael S Middleton; Mark L Van Natta; Elhamy R Heba; Adina Alazraki; Andrew T Trout; Prakash Masand; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Edward Doo; James Tonascia; Joel E Lavine; Wei Shen; Gavin Hamilton; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Lindsey M Negrete; Michael S Middleton; Lisa Clark; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Jessica Lam; Chris Changchien; Ivan M Deyoung-Dominguez; Gavin Hamilton; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mark Barahman; Eduardo Grunvald; Pablo J Prado; Alejandro Bussandri; Walter C Henderson; Tanya Wolfson; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Jennifer Y Cui; Danielle Batakis; Yang Xu; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Alexandra N Schlein; Lindsey M Negrete; Michael S Middleton; Gavin Hamilton; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-02-20