Literature DB >> 16244259

Accuracy of liver fat quantification at MR imaging: comparison of out-of-phase gradient-echo and fat-saturated fast spin-echo techniques--initial experience.

Aliya Qayyum1, Jeffrey S Goh, Sanjay Kakar, Benjamin M Yeh, Raphael B Merriman, Fergus V Coakley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the relative accuracy of liver fat quantification with out-of-phase gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging in patients with and without cirrhosis, with histologic analysis as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Committee on Human Research approval was obtained. Patient consent was not required. Data collection ended before HIPAA regulations were implemented, but patient anonymity was maintained. Twenty-seven patients, 16 with cirrhosis, were retrospectively identified who underwent MR imaging before histopathologic evaluation of liver fat at biopsy or surgery. The patient population consisted of 15 male and 12 female patients (mean age, 55 years; range, 16-75 years). One radiologist blinded to the histopathologic results recorded mean signal intensity derived from three regions of interest placed in the right and left lobes of the liver on three sections and signal intensity of the spleen from one region of interest within the same section. Liver fat was quantified with the relative loss of signal intensity on out-of-phase images compared with that on in-phase T1-weighted gradient-echo images and with relative loss of signal intensity on T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images obtained with fat saturation compared with those obtained without fat saturation. Hotelling t test was used to compare correlation coefficients between relative signal intensity differences and histopathologically determined percentage of fat.
RESULTS: In patients without cirrhosis, liver fat quantification with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging was significantly better than it was with out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging (r = 0.92 vs 0.69, P < .01). In patients with cirrhosis, liver fat quantification was correlated only with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging (r = 0.76, P < .01); the relative signal intensity loss on out-of-phase gradient-echo MR images was not correlated with histopathologically determined percentage of fat (r = 0.25, P = .36).
CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest liver fat may be more accurately quantified with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging than with out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16244259     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2372040539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  57 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Fat quantification by use of phase change in dual-echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishimori; Masahiko Monma; Hitoshi Sakurai; Kouichi Iwai; Nobuyoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-11-30

Review 3.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Hepatic fat quantification magnetic resonance for monitoring treatment response in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Hong Koh; Seung Kim; Myung-Joon Kim; Hyun Gi Kim; Hyun Joo Shin; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 8.  Measurement of liver fat fraction and iron with MRI and MR spectroscopy techniques.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Maria Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Bobby Kalb; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 9.  Importance of imaging and recent developments in diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mustafa Koplay; Mesut Sivri; Hasan Erdogan; Alaaddin Nayman
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Diffusion analysis with triexponential function in hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hayashi; Tosiaki Miyati; Junji Takahashi; Yoshinori Tsuji; Hidesato Suzuki; Naomi Tagaya; Mariko Hiramoto; Kei Fukuzawa; Masakatsu Tano; Satoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.