BACKGROUND & AIMS: In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the distinction between steatosis and steatohepatitis (NASH) and the assessment of the severity of the disease rely on liver histology alone. The aim of this study was to assess the sampling error of liver biopsy and its impact on the diagnosis and staging of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with NAFLD underwent percutaneous liver biopsy with 2 samples collected. The agreement between paired biopsy specimens was assessed by the percentage of discordant results and by the kappa reliability test. RESULTS: No features displayed high agreement; substantial agreement was only seen for steatosis grade; moderate agreement for hepatocyte ballooning and perisinusoidal fibrosis; fair agreement for Mallory bodies; acidophilic bodies and lobular inflammation displayed only slight agreement. Overall, the discordance rate for the presence of hepatocyte ballooning was 18%, and ballooning would have been missed in 24% of patients had only 1 biopsy been performed. The negative predictive value of a single biopsy for the diagnosis of NASH was at best 0.74. Discordance of 1 stage or more was 41%. Six of 17 patients with bridging fibrosis (35%) on 1 sample had only mild or no fibrosis on the other and therefore could have been under staged with only 1 biopsy. Intraobserver variability was systematically lower than sampling variability and therefore could not account for most of the sampling error. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic lesions of NASH are unevenly distributed throughout the liver parenchyma; therefore, sampling error of liver biopsy can result in substantial misdiagnosis and staging inaccuracies.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the distinction between steatosis and steatohepatitis (NASH) and the assessment of the severity of the disease rely on liver histology alone. The aim of this study was to assess the sampling error of liver biopsy and its impact on the diagnosis and staging of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with NAFLD underwent percutaneous liver biopsy with 2 samples collected. The agreement between paired biopsy specimens was assessed by the percentage of discordant results and by the kappa reliability test. RESULTS: No features displayed high agreement; substantial agreement was only seen for steatosis grade; moderate agreement for hepatocyte ballooning and perisinusoidal fibrosis; fair agreement for Mallory bodies; acidophilic bodies and lobular inflammation displayed only slight agreement. Overall, the discordance rate for the presence of hepatocyte ballooning was 18%, and ballooning would have been missed in 24% of patients had only 1 biopsy been performed. The negative predictive value of a single biopsy for the diagnosis of NASH was at best 0.74. Discordance of 1 stage or more was 41%. Six of 17 patients with bridging fibrosis (35%) on 1 sample had only mild or no fibrosis on the other and therefore could have been under staged with only 1 biopsy. Intraobserver variability was systematically lower than sampling variability and therefore could not account for most of the sampling error. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic lesions of NASH are unevenly distributed throughout the liver parenchyma; therefore, sampling error of liver biopsy can result in substantial misdiagnosis and staging inaccuracies.
Authors: Sekou R Rawlins; Ola El-Zammar; J Michael Zinkievich; Nancy Newman; Robert A Levine Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Said A Al-Busafi; Peter Ghali; Philip Wong; Javier A Novales-Diaz; Marc Deschênes Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Maximilian Hatting; Clint D J Tavares; Kfir Sharabi; Amy K Rines; Pere Puigserver Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2017-09-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Elena Arriazu; Marina Ruiz de Galarreta; Francisco Javier Cubero; Marta Varela-Rey; María Pilar Pérez de Obanos; Tung Ming Leung; Aritz Lopategi; Aitor Benedicto; Ioana Abraham-Enachescu; Natalia Nieto Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 8.401