Literature DB >> 33089369

Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.

Christopher D Erb1, Katie A Smith2, Jeff Moher3.   

Abstract

Since its introduction nearly a half century ago, the Eriksen flanker task has prompted multiple theoretical and methodological advancements in the study of attention and control. Early research with the task inspired the continuous flow model of information processing, which in turn prompted researchers to investigate the dynamics of response competition using continuous behavioral measures. In recent years, the use of such measures in psychological research has increased dramatically as hand-tracking techniques have become more widely accessible. The current article highlights commonly overlooked links between Eriksen and colleagues' pioneering research investigating the continuous flow model and recent hand-tracking research investigating the dynamics of attention and control. After providing an overview of two hand-tracking techniques frequently used in psychological research, we review a series of recent studies that have used these techniques to investigate how the processes underlying attention and control (a) unfold over the course of a response (within-trial dynamics), (b) are impacted by recent experience (cross-trial dynamics), and (c) contribute to age-related changes observed across the life span (developmental dynamics). In addition to highlighting the central role that the flanker task has played in advancing psychological research and theory, this review underscores the advantages of collecting continuous behavioral measures, both in Eriksen's seminal work and in contemporary hand-tracking studies.

Keywords:  Attention; Cognitive control; Flanker task; Mouse tracking; Reach tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33089369     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02154-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  58 in total

1.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: does conflict really matter?

Authors:  Borís Burle; Sonia Allain; Franck Vidal; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.

Authors:  M G Coles; G Gratton; T R Bashore; C W Eriksen; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-02

8.  Where did you go wrong? Errors, partial errors, and the nature of human information processing.

Authors:  M G Coles; M K Scheffers; L Fournier
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1995-11

Review 9.  Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Julie M Bugg; James R Schmidt; Matthew J C Crump; Daniel H Weissman; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  1 in total

1.  Theta but not beta activity is modulated by freedom of choice during action selection.

Authors:  Emeline Pierrieau; Sarah Kessouri; Jean-François Lepage; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.