| Literature DB >> 24983476 |
Xin Qian1, Quan-Jian Li2, Fen Liu3, Mao-Jiang Gong4, Cai-Xia Wang5, Min Tian6.
Abstract
Knowledge about the population genetic variation of the endangered orchid, Cypripedium japonicum, is conducive to the development of conservation strategies. Here, we examined the levels and partitioning of inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) diversity (109 loci) in five populations of this orchid to gain insight into its genetic variation and population structure in Eastern and Central China. It harbored considerably lower levels of genetic diversity both at the population (percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL) = 11.19%, Nei's gene diversity (H) = 0.0416 and Shannon's information index (I) = 0.0613) and species level (PPL = 38.53%, H = 0.1273 and I = 0.1928) and a significantly higher degree of differentiation among populations (the proportion of the total variance among populations (Φpt) = 0.698) than those typical of ISSR-based studies in other orchid species. Furthermore, the Nei's genetic distances between populations were independent of the corresponding geographical distances. Two main clusters are shown in an arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrogram, which is in agreement with the results of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) analysis and the STRUCTURE program. In addition, individuals within a population were more similar to each other than to those in other populations. Based on the genetic data and our field survey, the development of conservation management for this threatened orchid should include habitat protection, artificial gene flow and ex situ measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24983476 PMCID: PMC4139801 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150711578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Genetic diversity of Cypripedium japonicum populations.
| Populations |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1284 (0.3361) | 1.0670 (0.2128) | 0.0393 (0.1194) | 0.0593 (0.1738) | 12.84% | |
| 1.1101 (0.3144) | 1.0724 (0.2282) | 0.0413 (0.1252) | 0.0609 (0.1810) | 11.01% | |
| 1.0734 (0.2620) | 1.0510 (0.1871) | 0.0297 (0.1071) | 0.0435 (0.1563) | 7.34% | |
| 1.1560 (0.3645) | 1.1041 (0.2713) | 0.0587 (0.1471) | 0.0863 (0.2114) | 15.60% | |
| 1.0917 (0.2900) | 1.0697 (0.2274) | 0.0389 (0.1248) | 0.0563 (0.1794) | 9.17% | |
| 1.1119 (0.3134) | 1.0728 (0.2253) | 0.0416 (0.1247) | 0.0613 (0.1804) | 11.19% | |
| 1.3853 (0.4889) | 1.2132 (0.3283) | 0.1273 (0.1824) | 0.1928 (0.2656) | 38.53% | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0.1264 (0.0329) | 0.0416 (0.066) | 0.6712 | 0.2450 |
Na, observed number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles; H, Nei’s gene diversity; I, Shannon’s information index; PPL, the percentage of polymorphic loci; Ht, total genetic diversity; Hs, genetic diversity within populations; Gst, genetic differentiation among populations; Nm, gene flow; values in brackets are standard deviations; DBS, Damingshan population; SNJ, Shennongjia population; TMS, Tianmushan population; DMS, Damingshan population; BTM, Baotianman population.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for the C. japonicum populations.
| SV | d.f. | SSD | MSD | VC | TVP |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 579.734 | 144.934 | 5.624 | 70% | 0.698 | 0.001 | |
| 123 | 299.211 | 2.433 | 2.433 | 30% | |||
| 127 | 878.945 | 8.056 | 100% |
SV, source of variation; d.f., degree of freedom; SSD, sum of squares; MSD, mean squares; VC, variance component; TVP, total variance percentage; Φpt, the proportion of the total variance among populations.
Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal) among the C. japonicum populations.
| Populations | DBS | SNJ | TMS | DMS | BTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **** | 0.9055 | 0.8508 | 0.9128 | 0.8731 | |
| 0.0993 | **** | 0.9098 | 0.8887 | 0.9205 | |
| 0.1616 | 0.0945 | **** | 0.8557 | 0.9012 | |
| 0.0912 | 0.1180 | 0.1558 | **** | 0.8835 | |
| 0.1357 | 0.0828 | 0.1040 | 0.1239 | **** |
****, invalid data.
Figure 1Relationship between genetic and geographic distance of the C. japonicum populations.
Figure 2Arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrogram based on Nei’s genetic distances among populations.
Figure 3UPGMA dendrogram for all individuals of C. japonicum.
Figure 4The principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of five C. japonicum populations based on the two principal axes.
Figure 5The results of the Bayesian assignment analysis using the Structure Harvester.
Figure 6Population structure of six populations of C. japonicum prepared using the STRUCTURE program when K = 2 (above) and K = 5 (below).
Comparisons in genetic diversity and differentiation in orchid species based on inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers.
| Orchid Species |
|
|
|
| SR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.603 | 0.2949 | 50.9 | 0.686 | 0.3873 | 64.7 | 0.367 | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.216 | 0.314 | 52.41 | - | [ |
|
| 0.183 | 0.271 | 50.0 | 0.398 | 0.576 | 96.80 | 0.55 | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.219 | 0.323 | 56.63 | - | [ |
|
| - | - | 56.8 | - | - | - | 0.18 | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.163 | 0.237 | 30.72 | - | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.132 | 0.193 | 30.12 | - | [ |
|
| - | - | - | 0.213 | 0.314 | 56.02 | - | [ |
|
| 0.1945 | 0.2958 | 63.06 | 0.2628 | 0.4037 | 88.19 | 0.244 | [ |
|
| 0.0871 | 0.1290 | 23.93 | 0.3227 | 0.4779 | 89.74 | 0.7443 | [ |
|
| 0.176 | 0.270 | 59.09 | 0.236 | 0.367 | 81.82 | 0.2725 | [ |
|
| 0.2648 | 0.4005 | 91.57 | 0.352 | 0.530 | - | 0.76 | [ |
|
| 0.2578 | 0.382 | 82.4 | 0.338 | 0.508 | - | 0.12 | [ |
|
| 0.2847 | 0.4236 | 80.28 | 0.3839 | 0.5646 | 91.66 | 0.2577 | [ |
|
| 0.062 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.424 | [ |
|
| 0.059 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.394 | [ |
|
| 0.084 | - | 22.61 | 0.184 | - | 61.7 | 0.70 | [ |
|
| 0.1312 | - | 35.35 | 0.182 | - | 57.5 | 0.49 | [ |
|
| 0.119 | - | 32.64 | 0.172 | - | 43.0 | 0.36 | [ |
|
| 0.0309 | - | 7.95 | - | - | - | 0.415 | [ |
|
| 0.1812 | 0.3084 | 50.51 | 0.2788 | 0.3997 | 64.36 | 0.4186 |
Hp, Nei’s gene diversity at the population level; Ip, Shannon’s information index at the population level; PPLp, the percentage of polymorphic loci at the population level; Hs, Nei’s gene diversity at species level; Is, Shannon’s information index at the species level; PPLs: the percentage of polymorphic loci at the species level; SR, source references; “-” means the corresponding information is not available.
Figure 7Map of five sampled populations of C. japonicum in China.
Sampling details of the C. japonicum populations.
| Populations | Locality | Geographical Coordinate | Sample Size | Voucher Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBS | Dabieshan, Anhui province | 31°24'N, 116°36'E | 22 | Q526 |
| SNJ | Shennongjia, Hubei province | 31°21'N, 110°03'E | 27 | Q611 |
| TMS | Tianmushan, Zhejiang province | 30°21'N, 119°25'E | 28 | L605 |
| DMS | Damingshan, Zhejiang province | 30°03'N, 118°59'E | 33 | L522 |
| BTM | Baotianman, Henan province | 33°26'N, 111°38'E | 18 | Q518 |
ISSR primers used in the present study.
| Primer Name | Sequence (5'→3') | Annealing Temperature (°C) | Primer Name | Sequence (5'→3') | Annealing Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBC807 | (AG)8T | 52 | UBC846 | (CA)8RT | 50 |
| UBC818 | (CA)8G | 52 | UBC849 | (GT)8YA | 52 |
| UBC827 | (AC)8G | 53 | UBC853 | (TC)8RA | 51 |
| UBC836 | (AG)8YA | 51 | UBC856 | (AC)8YA | 50 |
| UBC842 | (AG)8G | 53 | UBC859 | (CG)8RC | 51 |
| UBC844 | (CT)8RC | 52 | UBC865 | (CCG)6 | 58 |
| UBC845 | (CT)8RG | 52 | UBC868 | (GAA)6 | 47 |
Y = (C, T); R = (A, G).