| Literature DB >> 22605989 |
Han-Qi Yang1, Man-Yun An1, Zhi-Jia Gu1, Bo Tian2.
Abstract
Dendrocalamus membranaceus Munro is a woody bamboo with a high economic and ecological value that often occurs as natural stands, such as in the large-scale forested areas of China's Yunnan Province. Due to its overexploitation, the habitat of D. membranaceus in Yunnan has been dramatically reduced, and the quality of the stands has declined. As a preliminary analysis in considering the effective protection for these germplasm resources, we assessed the genetic diversity of 12 natural populations in Yunnan, using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. From 10 ISSR primers, we generated 155 bands, of which 153 were polymorphic (98.71%). Compared with other species in the genus, this species demonstrated a greater genetic diversity (S = 0.349) and lower genetic differentiation (G(ST) = 0.252). Our analysis of molecular variance revealed that the genetic differentiation among the populations is significant. A large proportion of the genetic variation (78.95%) resides among the individuals within populations, whereas only 21.05% are found among populations. Mantel tests indicated no significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances among the populations. Given the low sexual reproducibility and characteristics of monocarpic plants, we recommend implementing in situ conservation measures for all of the D. membranaceus populations in Yunnan and collecting sufficient samples for ex situ conservation. Furthermore, the conservation area should be extended to its main natural habitats, the Lancang-Mekong River Valley.Entities:
Keywords: Dendrocalamus membranaceus; ISSR; genetic variation; population structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22605989 PMCID: PMC3344225 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13044446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Populations of Dendrocalamus membranaceus examined in the ISSR analysis.
| Population Code | Location in Yunnan Province | Elevation (m) | Sample Size (Number of Clumps) | Geographic Coordinates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YJ | Tongbiguan, Yingjiang | 310 | 20 | 24°26′32″N, 97°32′51″E |
| XP | Gasa, Xinping | 660 | 20 | 24°21′03″N, 101°37′50″E |
| GM | Mengding, Gengma | 532 | 20 | 23°30′25″N, 99°01′13″E |
| PR | Simaogang, Pu’er | 636 | 20 | 22°29′24″N, 100°35′32″E |
| MY | Mengyang, Jinghong | 905 | 20 | 22°08′38″N, 100°53′18″E |
| YW | Yiwu, Mengla | 844 | 20 | 22°06′13″N, 101°25′36″E |
| JH | Jinghong, Jinghong | 638 | 20 | 22°03′04″N, 100°43′03″E |
| MB | Manbian, Mengla, | 550 | 20 | 21°55′17″N, 101°16′39″E |
| ML | Menglong, Jinghong | 723 | 20 | 21°46′18″N, 100°45′41″E |
| GL | Guanlei, Mengla | 785 | 20 | 21°39′29″N, 101°22′41″E |
| MZ | Manzhuang, Mengla | 625 | 20 | 21°29′32″N, 101°34′22″E |
| MM | Mengman, Mengla | 788 | 20 | 21°21′41″N, 101°20′19″E |
Sequences and numbers of bands for 10 primers.
| Primer | Sequence 5′→3′ | No. of Amplified Bands | % Reproducibility of Bands | No. of Polymorphic Bands | % Polymorphic Bands (PPB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBC 807 | (AG)8T | 19 | 95 | 18 | 95 |
| UBC 810 | (GA)8T | 17 | 92 | 17 | 100 |
| UBC 841 | (GA)8YC | 18 | 94 | 18 | 100 |
| UBC 853 | (TC)8RT | 13 | 94 | 13 | 100 |
| UBC 855 | (AC)8YT | 15 | 96 | 14 | 93 |
| UBC 857 | (AC)8YG | 12 | 91 | 12 | 100 |
| UBC 859 | (TG)8RC | 16 | 93 | 16 | 100 |
| UBC 864 | (ATG)6 | 15 | 90 | 15 | 100 |
| UBC 873 | (GACA)4 | 18 | 92 | 18 | 100 |
| UBC 878 | (GGAT)4 | 12 | 88 | 12 | 100 |
| Total | 155 | 93 | 153 | 99 |
Figure 1Genetic profile of Mengyang (MY) population using primer UBC810 (as described in Table 2). Lane C represents the blank control and lanes 1–20 represent template DNA for each individual from MY.
Genetic variability within populations of Dendrocalamus membranaceus.
| Population Code | % Polymorphic Bands (PPB) | Expected Heterozygosity | Shannon’s Diversity Index | Number of Private Bands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YJ | 49 | 0.165 (0.194) | 0.248 (0.281) | 2 |
| XP | 39 | 0.150 (0.205) | 0.219 (0.293) | 0 |
| GM | 55 | 0.186 (0.202) | 0.279 (0.287) | 4 |
| PR | 50 | 0.167 (0.194) | 0.252 (0.280) | 2 |
| MY | 49 | 0.173 (0.199) | 0.259 (0.287) | 3 |
| YW | 51 | 0.179 (0.201) | 0.267 (0.288) | 0 |
| JH | 47 | 0.156 (0.192) | 0.236 (0.277) | 0 |
| MB | 52 | 0.176 (0.204) | 0.263 (0.290) | 7 |
| ML | 51 | 0.162 (0.191) | 0.264 (0.275) | 3 |
| GL | 39 | 0.146 (0.199) | 0.216 (0.287) | 2 |
| MZ | 50 | 0.162 (0.192) | 0.246 (0.277) | 1 |
| MM | 45 | 0.147 (0.187) | 0.220 (0.272) | 0 |
| Mean (SD) | 48 | 0.164 (0.013) | 0.249 (0.021) |
Population codes are explained with Table 1.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) variation for Dendrocalamus membranaceus populations.
| Source of Variation | Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | Variance Components | % Total Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 11 | 114.58 | 10.42 | 0.44 | 21.05 | <0.001 |
| Within populations | 228 | 375.0 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 78.95 | <0.001 |
| Total | 239 | 489.58 | 2.08 |
Figure 2Young seedlings of Dendrocalamus membranaceus in Jinghong (JH) population.
Figure 3UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s (1972) genetic distances among 12 populations of Dendrocalamus membranaceus.
Geographic distance (km) (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal) between populations of Dendrocalamus membranaceus.
| YJ | XP | GM | PR | MY | YW | JH | MB | ML | GL | MZ | MM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YJ | - | 411 | 203 | 380 | 408 | 470 | 404 | 495 | 447 | 512 | 529 | 523 |
| XP | 0.094 | - | 261 | 238 | 252 | 239 | 261 | 296 | 320 | 314 | 325 | 334 |
| GM | 0.060 | 0.103 | - | 178 | 207 | 268 | 203 | 294 | 252 | 311 | 328 | 324 |
| PR | 0.050 | 0.109 | 0.071 | - | 30 | 96 | 30 | 117 | 92 | 135 | 151 | 149 |
| MY | 0.062 | 0.099 | 0.067 | 0.067 | - | 74 | 12 | 87 | 69 | 105 | 121 | 119 |
| YW | 0.064 | 0.116 | 0.074 | 0.073 | 0.075 | - | 84 | 57 | 106 | 74 | 86 | 94 |
| JH | 0.052 | 0.091 | 0.063 | 0.049 | 0.040 | 0.056 | - | 92 | 63 | 108 | 125 | 121 |
| MB | 0.084 | 0.150 | 0.101 | 0.048 | 0.091 | 0.087 | 0.072 | - | 74 | 18 | 34 | 38 |
| ML | 0.048 | 0.113 | 0.072 | 0.041 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.029 | 0.062 | - | 80 | 94 | 82 |
| GL | 0.095 | 0.105 | 0.104 | 0.083 | 0.091 | 0.094 | 0.060 | 0.101 | 0.069 | - | 17 | 20 |
| MZ | 0.053 | 0.099 | 0.088 | 0.063 | 0.070 | 0.062 | 0.050 | 0.090 | 0.052 | 0.045 | - | 16 |
| MM | 0.072 | 0.066 | 0.086 | 0.069 | 0.072 | 0.094 | 0.049 | 0.102 | 0.064 | 0.086 | 0.074 | - |
Population codes are explained with Table 1
Figure 4Correlation between geographic distance and genetic distance for 12 populations of Dendrocalamus membranaceus.
Figure 5Distribution of extant natural Dendrocalamus membranaceus forests (shaded) and locations of 12 populations sampled in Yunnan Province, China.