| Literature DB >> 22942696 |
Lin Wei1,2,3, Xian-Jin Wu1,2,3.
Abstract
Houttuynia cordata is an important traditional Chinese herb with unresolved genetics and taxonomy, which lead to potential problems in the conservation and utilization of the resource. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used to assess the level and distribution of genetic diversity in 226 individuals from 15 populations of H. cordata in China. ISSR analysis revealed low genetic variations within populations but high genetic differentiations among populations. This genetic structure probably mainly reflects the historical association among populations. Genetic cluster analysis showed that the basal clade is composed of populations from Southwest China, and the other populations have continuous and eastward distributions. The structure of genetic diversity in H. cordata demonstrated that this species might have survived in Southwest China during the glacial age, and subsequently experienced an eastern postglacial expansion. Based on the results of genetic analysis, it was proposed that as many as possible targeted populations for conservation be included.Entities:
Keywords: Houttuynia cordata; ISSR; genetic variation; population differentiation
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22942696 PMCID: PMC3430227 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13078159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Molecular variation measured as effective number of alleles (Ne), Nei’s (1973) gene diversity (H), the Shannon index (I), and the percentage of polymorphic bands (Pp) per population as well as their Standard deviations (S.D.), population-specific bands (PSB).
| Pop. ID | PSB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG | 1.1981 (0.3149) | 0.1202 (0.1755) | 0.1846 (0.2562) | 40.00% | 1 |
| XM | 1.1274 (0.2552) | 0.0802 (0.1475) | 0.1265 (0.2191) | 30.43% | 0 |
| YA | 1.1069 (0.2486) | 0.0653 (0.1417) | 0.1011 (0.2088) | 23.48% | 0 |
| EM | 1.0741 (0.2290) | 0.0427 (0.1253) | 0.0639 (0.1816) | 13.04% | 0 |
| KM | 1.2556 (0.3574) | 0.1494 (0.1940) | 0.2239 (0.2798) | 42.61% | 1 |
| HX | 1.1263 (0.2690) | 0.0767 (0.1515) | 0.1178 (0.2229) | 25.22% | 0 |
| NC | 1.1460 (0.2913) | 0.0871 (0.1618) | 0.1325 (0.2362) | 27.83% | 0 |
| LC | 1.1491 (0.2757) | 0.0924 (0.1586) | 0.1438 (0.2336) | 33.91% | 3 |
| DW | 1.1964 (0.3439) | 0.1125 (0.1829) | 0.1683 (0.2628) | 32.17% | 0 |
| YQ | 1.1817 (0.3235) | 0.1057 (0.1783) | 0.1586 (0.2572) | 33.04% | 0 |
| HH | 1.1555 (0.2667) | 0.0998 (0.1541) | 0.1596 (0.2288) | 41.74% | 0 |
| YX | 1.1964 (0.3123) | 0.1198 (0.1732) | 0.1859 (0.2520) | 42.61% | 0 |
| RC | 1.1083 (0.2663) | 0.0630 (0.1471) | 0.0942 (0.2137) | 18.26% | 0 |
| LX | 1.0583 (0.1854) | 0.0364 (0.1085) | 0.0565 (0.1626) | 12.17% | 1 |
| ZJ | 1.2272 (0.3463) | 0.1335 (0.1869) | 0.2018 (0.2697) | 40.87% | 1 |
| Total | 1.4622 (0.3210) | 0.2820 (0.1596) | 0.4338 (0.2097) | 97.39% | 7 |
Nei’s (1972) original measures of genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal).
| Pop. ID | LYG | XM | YA | EM | KM | HX | NC | LC | DW | YQ | HH | YX | RC | LX | ZJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG | - | 0.9184 | 0.7467 | 0.7708 | 0.8137 | 0.7494 | 0.8114 | 0.8273 | 0.8431 | 0.7826 | 0.7941 | 0.8273 | 0.8333 | 0.8563 | 0.8571 |
| XM | 0.0851 | - | 0.7421 | 0.7461 | 0.8168 | 0.7842 | 0.8117 | 0.8484 | 0.8178 | 0.7637 | 0.8075 | 0.8350 | 0.8153 | 0.7976 | 0.8223 |
| YA | 0.2921 | 0.2982 | - | 0.8454 | 0.6834 | 0.7421 | 0.7413 | 0.7252 | 0.7511 | 0.7213 | 0.7800 | 0.7946 | 0.6960 | 0.7486 | 0.7845 |
| EM | 0.2604 | 0.2929 | 0.1679 | - | 0.6936 | 0.6943 | 0.7143 | 0.7144 | 0.7856 | 0.7202 | 0.7914 | 0.8097 | 0.7190 | 0.7320 | 0.7756 |
| KM | 0.2062 | 0.2023 | 0.3807 | 0.3659 | - | 0.8264 | 0.7670 | 0.7511 | 0.7231 | 0.7683 | 0.7756 | 0.7645 | 0.7496 | 0.7393 | 0.8153 |
| HX | 0.2885 | 0.2431 | 0.2983 | 0.3649 | 0.1907 | - | 0.7871 | 0.8088 | 0.7795 | 0.7435 | 0.7633 | 0.7820 | 0.7232 | 0.7210 | 0.7497 |
| NC | 0.2090 | 0.2087 | 0.2994 | 0.3365 | 0.2653 | 0.2393 | - | 0.8041 | 0.7495 | 0.7168 | 0.7590 | 0.7851 | 0.7693 | 0.7142 | 0.8032 |
| LC | 0.1896 | 0.1644 | 0.3213 | 0.3364 | 0.2862 | 0.2122 | 0.2180 | - | 0.7589 | 0.7265 | 0.7590 | 0.8043 | 0.8045 | 0.8137 | 0.7854 |
| DW | 0.1707 | 0.2011 | 0.2862 | 0.2413 | 0.3242 | 0.2491 | 0.2883 | 0.2759 | - | 0.7454 | 0.7918 | 0.8045 | 0.7268 | 0.7425 | 0.7970 |
| YQ | 0.2452 | 0.2695 | 0.3268 | 0.3282 | 0.2636 | 0.2964 | 0.3330 | 0.3195 | 0.2938 | - | 0.7422 | 0.7736 | 0.7566 | 0.7433 | 0.8016 |
| HH | 0.2306 | 0.2138 | 0.2484 | 0.2340 | 0.2541 | 0.2701 | 0.2757 | 0.2757 | 0.2335 | 0.2981 | - | 0.8704 | 0.7383 | 0.7721 | 0.7946 |
| YX | 0.1896 | 0.1804 | 0.2300 | 0.2111 | 0.2685 | 0.2458 | 0.2420 | 0.2178 | 0.2176 | 0.2567 | 0.1388 | - | 0.7909 | 0.7682 | 0.8399 |
| RC | 0.1824 | 0.2042 | 0.3624 | 0.3299 | 0.2882 | 0.3240 | 0.2622 | 0.2176 | 0.3191 | 0.2789 | 0.3034 | 0.2346 | - | 0.8584 | 0.7746 |
| LX | 0.1551 | 0.2261 | 0.2896 | 0.3119 | 0.3020 | 0.3272 | 0.3367 | 0.2062 | 0.2978 | 0.2967 | 0.2586 | 0.2637 | 0.1527 | - | 0.7974 |
| ZJ | 0.1542 | 0.1957 | 0.2427 | 0.2541 | 0.2041 | 0.2881 | 0.2192 | 0.2416 | 0.2269 | 0.2211 | 0.2299 | 0.1744 | 0.2554 | 0.2264 | - |
Analysis of molecular variances for 15 H. cordata populations.
| Source of Variation | Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | Variance Components | % Total Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 14 | 51.150 | 3.654 | 0.203 | 77% |
| Within populations | 251 | 15.316 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 23% |
| Total | 265 | 66.466 | 0.264 | 100% | |
|
| |||||
| Stat | Value | ||||
| ΦPT | 0.769 | 0.010 | |||
Figure 1UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s (1972) genetic distance.
Populations of H. cordata Thunb examined in the inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis.
| Code | Populations | Number of Samples | Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Altitude (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG | Lianyungang, JiangSu | 18 | 34°36′ | 119°36′ | 20 |
| XM | Xiamen, FuJian | 19 | 24°13′ | 118°14′ | 18 |
| YA | Ya’an, SiChuan | 20 | 29° 54′ | 102°54′ | 2636 |
| EM | Emei, SiChuan | 18 | 29°34′ | 103°24′ | 2449 |
| KM | Kunming, YunNan | 20 | 25°06′ | 102°44′ | 1895 |
| HX | Huaxi, GuiZhou | 18 | 26°10′ | 106°37′ | 1112 |
| NC | Nanchuan, ChongQing | 17 | 29°11′ | 107°08′ | 468 |
| LC | Luchuan, GuangXi | 20 | 22°20′ | 110°15′ | 218 |
| DW | Dawu, HuBei | 20 | 31°37′ | 114°06′ | 389 |
| YQ | YanQiao, SiChuan | 20 | 27°25′ | 101°31′ | 1987 |
| HH | Huaihua, HuNan | 20 | 27°32′ | 109°57′ | 866 |
| YX | Youxian, HuNan | 20 | 27°11′ | 113°23′ | 452 |
| RC | Ruichang, JiangXi | 17 | 29°17′ | 115°41′ | 157 |
| LX | Lanxi, ZheJiang | 13 | 29°37′ | 119°22′ | 121 |
| ZJ | Zhanjiang, GuangDong | 6 | 21°12′ | 110°18′ | 24 |
Figure 2Locations of the sampled populations of H. cordata.