Literature DB >> 29299395

Development of microsatellite markers for Cypripedium tibeticum (Orchidaceae) and their applicability to two related species.

Jing Li1, Yibo Luo2, Lingling Xu1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To investigate genetic diversity and structure, microsatellite markers were developed and characterized for Cypripedium tibeticum, an endangered orchid species, and their utility tested in two relatives: C. flavum and C. bardolphianum. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Candidate microsatellite loci were isolated based on next-generation sequencing. We identified 20 polymorphic loci with di- or trinucleotide repeats in three populations of C. tibeticum. Genotyping results showed the total number of alleles per locus varied from two to 21, and the observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.261 to 0.967 and 0.441 to 0.960, respectively. Cross-species amplification showed most of the markers were applicable to C. flavum and C. bardolphianum.
CONCLUSIONS: The 20 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed in this study are useful tools for studying the conservation genetics and phylogeography of C. tibeticum and its related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cypripedium tibeticum; Orchidaceae; genetic diversity; microsatellites

Year:  2017        PMID: 29299395      PMCID: PMC5749819          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1700084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Cypripedium tibeticum King ex Rolfe (Orchidaceae), known as Chinese lady slipper, is a unique orchid species with high ornamental and medicinal value. It is endemic to southwestern China, including Tibet, Gansu, Yunnan, Guizhou, and Sichuan provinces. Cypripedium tibeticum mainly grows in alpine meadows, scrub forests, and forest margins at high altitudes (2800–4200 m a.s.l.). The natural population size of this orchid is usually limited by habitat fragmentation and overharvesting (Chen and Tsi, 1998; Fay and Chase, 2009; Swarts and Dixon, 2009; Bronstein et al., 2014). Due to habitat destruction and human activities, the survival of C. tibeticum in its native range is threatened, and it is currently listed as a national protected plant (Luo et al., 2003; Qian et al., 2014). Microsatellites (simple sequence repeats [SSRs]) are widely used molecular markers that are applied in population genetics to investigate genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary history (Hodel et al., 2016; Vieira et al., 2016). To date, microsatellite markers have been developed for several Cypripedium L. species; however, scarcely any markers are applicable to C. tibeticum (Fay and Cowan, 2001; Pandey and Sharma, 2013; Yamashita et al., 2016). In this study, we developed and characterized 20 polymorphic SSR markers in C. tibeticum and tested their applicability in two related species: C. flavum P. F. Hunt & Summerh. and C. bardolphianum W. W. Sm. & Farrer. These microsatellites will be valuable tools for ecological, phylogeographic, and conservation studies of C. tibeticum and other related Cypripedium species.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plant sample collection and DNA extraction

Leaf samples of C. tibeticum were collected from three locations in Sichuan Province, including Huanglong, Kangding, and Xiaojinxian in China (population codes: HL, KD, and XJX, respectively [Appendix 1]). Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf tissue of each individual using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit according to manufacturer instructions (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA).

Development and screening of microsatellite markers

Total genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme HaeIII, and products were 5′ phosphorylated and a single A was added at the 3′ end. DNA was ligated to a Solexa adapter and sequenced on a single HiSeq 2500 flow cell (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). A total of 7,210,538 reads longer than 100 bp were obtained, and raw reads with quality scores less than 25 and lengths shorter than 25 bp after stripping the adapters were filtered using SeqPrep (https://github.com/jstjohn/seqprep). De novo assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench (QIAGEN) and produced 1,920,476 contigs, where parameters were set as: average coverage value of 25× and minimum contig length of 299 bp. MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.8 software was used to identify contigs carrying di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats with a minimum of five repeats and a minimum tract length of 100 bp (other parameters were set to default settings) (Faircloth, 2008). Ninety-four primer pairs were designed for microsatellite loci candidates using Primer Premier 5.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA) and tested with 15 C. tibeticum samples (five individuals from each population) for amplification efficiency and polymorphism. Each 15-μL PCR reaction contained ∼15 ng of genomic DNA, 1.5 μL of 10× PCR buffer, 0.8 μL of fluorescently labeled TP-M13 (5 mM), 1.0 μL of each primer (10 mM), 1.5 μL of dNTP (10 mM), and 0.1 μL of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). All candidate primer pairs were tested by a touchdown PCR protocol as follows: 94°C for 2 min; five cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60–56°C (Δ1°C touchdown per cycle) for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min. Results from testing primer pairs showed that 26 pairs produced bands within the expected size range on agarose gels in all the samples tested. The size of amplified fragments from these loci was further analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), and allele sizes were scored by GeneMapper version 3.2 software (Applied Biosystems). Twenty loci were polymorphic and showed clear peaks. The authenticity of these amplified loci was confirmed by Sanger sequencing of representative PCR products, and sequences have been deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Sequence library data of this study were deposited to the Sequence Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; BioProject ID: PRJNA393499).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite loci developed in Cypripedium tibeticum.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)Fluorescent labelTa (°C)GenBank accession no.
M150F: GGATGAGGAAACCCTAGCGT(GTA)5(AT)7153–164HEX60KY490005
R: GATTCTCCTTGATGGCAATGT
M164F: GTTAGGTGAAGGCTAGAAGGT(AAG)8137–188FAM60KY490006
R: AGCTGAGAGTGGAAGATCATAT
M172F: CACCTCTATTCCACTTTGCCT(AG)8153–161HEX62KY490007
R: GTAAAGGGATAGCACATGCAC
M182F: GTGGTGGACCGATCATACCT(TTC)16148–163FAM62KY490008
R: GGAGAATTTAGTGGAAGAGAGAT
M209F: GGGTCCTTTTGTTGACCTACT(CT)8170–182HEX57KY490009
R: AACCCTAATTGGTCAATTCGAT
M289F: ATCACCTTTCCACAATCATGT(AAG)8177–201HEX58KY490010
R: TGCTGTCACCATTGAACTCT
M294F: ATACAGAGCCAGCCTACACT(AT)9161–169FAM63KY490011
R: AGTAACTAGTGGAGCACAGCT
M372F: TCCTAGTTCGAAGATGATGGT(TTC)5154–160HEX60KY490012
R: TAGCTACAGCCAAATTCGGT
M401F: TCAGGATTACAGCCCTAAACT(AG)8161–175FAM59KY490013
R: GGGAGATTCAGTTACTAGAGCT
M576F: AATCATCAAAGGGAGAGCAAT(AAG)9301–310FAM62KY490014
R: TTTGTCACCACCATGATAGAGT
M112F: AAGACTGGAAGTAGCGGAGAT(CT)10232–304FAM53MF398589
R: GAAGTCTACATCCACTGTTCCT
M130F: TTCAGCAGATTCAGATTTAGCT(CAT)5(CTT)3182–218HEX51MF398590
R: CTTCTGACAGATCTTCTCCAAT
M136F: TCCAACCTCTCTATCCTCGAT(TTC)9185–191HEX53MF398591
R: GATCTGAGGAGGATGAAGGT
M139F: GAGGGAGGATTCTGACAACT(TC)11213–231FAM53MF398592
R: GTGGTTCGACTTCGTGAAAT
M142F: TTGTGCATCGTCATCAAGGT(TC)7153–155HEX53MF398593
R: GATCACAAACATGCTGGGAT
M233F: ACACGCTACAGACCGAGCT(CAT)6169–184FAM51MF398594
R: CTTGTTTGCAAGATGAATGCT
M370F: GGAGATTCAGTTATCAGAGCTG(TC)24271–339FAM52MF398595
R: AGTCTACATCCACTATTCCTTGT
M681F: ATGCCAGACGGCAGAGGT(TG)10150–160HEX55MF398596
R: GGCTTTGAGCTAATGGCTCT
M880F: GGAGAACAGGAAAACTGTTCAT(TC)10137–147FAM52MF398597
R: AGCCGATTACAAAGTCACTGT
M886F: CGAAATTCACTGGGATTCAGT(CT)9156–164HEX52MF398598
R: TCTCAGGATTACAACAGTAGCT

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite loci developed in Cypripedium tibeticum. Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

Data analysis and results

These 20 microsatellite loci were PCR-amplified in an additional 74 individuals from three C. tibeticum populations collected in Sichuan Province. For each locus, the observed number of alleles, effective number of alleles, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity were calculated using PopGene32 version 1.32 (Yeh et al., 1999). Tests for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium were performed by GENEPOP Web version 4.2 (Rousset, 2008). The total number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 21 (mean ± SD: 6.350 ± 4.320). The observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.261 to 0.967 (0.664 ± 0.143) and from 0.441 to 0.960 (0.745 ± 0.119), respectively (Table 2). Of the 20 polymorphic loci, nine loci in the Huanglong population, six loci in the Kangding population, and five loci in the Xiaojinxian population deviated significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, respectively (P < 0.05; Table 2). Linkage disequilibrium was not detected at any locus.
Table 2.

Genetic variation of the 20 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three populations of Cypripedium tibeticum.

Huanglong (n = 30)Kangding (n = 23)Xiaojinxian (n = 21)
LocusAAeHoHeAAeHoHeAAeHoHe
M15053.1410.533*0.69353.7520.696*0.75054.0270.6190.770
M16494.3690.6670.78493.5860.522*0.737107.2300.620*0.883
M17243.3520.7000.71443.7650.8260.75143.3030.6670.714
M18243.8340.6070.75365.0420.6360.82054.3760.7370.792
M20954.3800.700*0.78564.0380.6090.76953.9200.6190.763
M28954.4780.967*0.79054.6400.9570.80264.6240.8000.804
M29453.9390.6330.75943.1740.6360.70154.3020.714*0.786
M37232.4100.833*0.59532.4890.8700.61232.5130.6190.617
M40153.5160.933*0.72852.3150.6960.58174.4320.6670.793
M57632.9250.379*0.67043.0100.6190.68432.8820.7140.669
M1122010.8520.724*0.9242116.1330.636*0.9602014.7000.714*0.955
M13075.2020.700*0.82275.4260.6960.83465.3130.667*0.832
M13632.0620.4670.52431.7960.4350.45331.7570.2860.441
M13994.4850.6900.79195.7280.6820.84575.7140.7000.846
M14222.0000.3100.50921.9100.2610.48721.9300.4290.494
M23353.6660.667*0.74064.1720.5910.77853.5710.6670.738
M370178.4760.7860.8981510.3770.810*0.926128.1120.632*0.900
M68153.3030.7330.70954.4450.739*0.79263.5710.7620.738
M88054.0000.7670.76364.9440.783*0.81664.8460.6190.813
M88654.8540.7000.75354.1650.7390.77754.0270.6670.770
Mean6.3004.2120.6750.7356.5004.7450.6720.7446.2504.7580.6460.756

Note: A = number of alleles; Ae = effective number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled for each population.

Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05).

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Genetic variation of the 20 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three populations of Cypripedium tibeticum. Note: A = number of alleles; Ae = effective number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled for each population. Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05). Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1. The utility of these 20 microsatellite loci developed for C. tibeticum was also detected in two other Cypripedium species: C. flavum and C. bardolphianum. Eighteen loci were successfully PCR-amplified in C. flavum, and 17 loci were amplified in C. bardolphianum (locus M294 did not amplify in C. bardolphianum, M370 and M886 did not amplify in either species). Genotyping results showed locus M372 was monomorphic in both species, and M136 was polymorphic in C. bardolphianum but monomorphic in C. flavum. All the other markers were polymorphic in both species (Table 3).
Table 3.

Characteristics and polymorphism of 20 microsatellite loci developed for Cypripedium tibeticum in C. flavum and C. bardolphianum.

C. flavum (n = 16)C. bardolphianum (n = 15)
LocusAllele size range (bp)AHoHeAllele size range (bp)AHoHe
M150155–21760.7500.807157–21740.7330.687
M164143–18860.6250.786140–18560.6670.752
M172155–15930.625*0.647147–16950.7330.736
M182136–16340.6880.659142–16340.6670.720
M209156–17360.8130.730151–18160.8000.786
M289180–19740.8750.724183–19230.8670.674
M294161–16320.5630.466
M37215710.0000.00015710.0000.000
M401161–16740.8130.684151–17370.8670.777
M576301–30730.7500.679301–30420.4000.497
M112234–286130.733*0.906238–280110.7690.905
M130189–19840.667*0.687174–18640.7500.736
M13618810.0000.000182–18520.3080.492
M139215–22130.6000.662215–22550.6430.743
M142147–15120.154*0.492155–15920.3330.391
M233173–18230.5000.623171–17720.2000.186
M370
M681146–15230.5630.684150–15220.4000.515
M880140–14630.5710.659144–15030.5390.655
M886
Mean3.9440.5720.6054.0590.5690.603

Note: — = unsuccessful amplification; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled for each population.

Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05).

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Characteristics and polymorphism of 20 microsatellite loci developed for Cypripedium tibeticum in C. flavum and C. bardolphianum. Note: — = unsuccessful amplification; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled for each population. Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05). Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed and validated 20 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the orchid C. tibeticum, most of which showed applicability in two related Cypripedium species: C. flavum and C. bardolphianum. These markers will be useful for population genetic investigation and species conservation in natural habitats of C. tibeticum and other closely related species.
Appendix 1.

Voucher and locality information for Cypripedium species used in this study.

SpeciesVoucher specimen accession no.bCollection localityLocality IDGeographic coordinatesn
C. tibeticum King ex RolfeCti-HLa05-XLHuanglong, Sichuan Province, ChinaHL32.750367°N, 103.823067°E30
C. tibeticumCti-KDa03-XLKangding, Sichuan Province, ChinaKD30.007833°N, 101.947433°E23
C. tibeticumCti-XJXa06-XLXiaojinxian, Sichuan Province, ChinaXJX31.053192°N, 102.786408°E21
C. flavum P. F. Hunt & Summerh.Cfl-HLb03-XLHuanglong, Sichuan Province, ChinaHL32.750367°N, 103.823067°E16
C. bardolphianum W. W. Sm. & FarrerCba-HLc01-XLHuanglong, Sichuan Province, ChinaHL32.750367°N, 103.823067°E15

Note: n = number of individuals sampled.

Vouchers are deposited in Xi’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China.

XL = Lingling Xu.

  9 in total

1.  Orchid biology: from Linnaeus via Darwin to the 21st century. Preface.

Authors:  Michael F Fay; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Perspectives on orchid conservation in botanic gardens.

Authors:  Nigel D Swarts; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design.

Authors:  Brant C Faircloth
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Understanding evolution and the complexity of species interactions using orchids as a model system.

Authors:  Judith L Bronstein; W Scott Armbruster; John N Thompson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Conservation genetics of an endangered lady's slipper orchid: Cypripedium japonicum in China.

Authors:  Xin Qian; Quan-Jian Li; Fen Liu; Mao-Jiang Gong; Cai-Xia Wang; Min Tian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite loci for the endangered orchid Cypripedium japonicum (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Yumi Yamashita; Ayako Izuno; Yuji Isagi; Takahide Kurosawa; Shingo Kaneko
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  The report of my death was an exaggeration: A review for researchers using microsatellites in the 21st century.

Authors:  Richard G J Hodel; M Claudia Segovia-Salcedo; Jacob B Landis; Andrew A Crowl; Miao Sun; Xiaoxian Liu; Matthew A Gitzendanner; Norman A Douglas; Charlotte C Germain-Aubrey; Shichao Chen; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira; Luciane Santini; Augusto Lima Diniz; Carla de Freitas Munhoz
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.771

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.