Literature DB >> 24981237

Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists.

Michael Fuoco1, Michael J Leveridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the attitudes and practices of urologists regarding social media use. Social media services have become ubiquitous, but their role in the context of medical practice is underappreciated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to all active members of the Canadian Urological Association by e-mail and surface mail. Likert scales were used to assess engagement in social media, as well as attitudes toward physician responsibilities, privacy concerns and patient interaction online.
RESULTS: Of 504 surveys delivered, 229 were completed (45.4%). Urologists reported frequent or daily personal and professional social media use in 26% and 8% of cases, respectively. There were no differences between paper (n = 103) or online (n = 126; P > 0.05) submissions. Among frequent social media users, YouTube (86%), Facebook (76%), and Twitter (41%) were most commonly used; 12% post content or links frequently to these sites. The most common perceived roles of social media in health care were for inter-professional communication (67%) or as a simple information repository (59%); online patient interaction was endorsed by 14% of urologists. Fewer than 19% had read published guidelines for online patient interaction, and ≤64% were unaware of their existence. In all, 94.6% agreed that physicians need to exercise caution personal social media posting, although 57% felt that medical regulatory bodies should 'stay out of [their] personal social media activities', especially those in practice <10 years (P = 0.001). In all, 56% agreed that social media integration in medical practice will be 'impossible' due to privacy and boundary issues; 73% felt that online interaction with patients would become unavoidable in the future, especially those in practice >20 years (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Practicing urologists engage infrequently in social media activities, and are almost universal in avoiding social media for professional use. Most feel that social media is best kept to exchanges between colleagues. Emerging data suggest an increasing involvement is likely in the continuing professional development space.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  education; medico-legal; professional development; social media; urologic practice

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24981237     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  17 in total

1.  Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Sasha DeWitt; Igor Tsaur; Axel Haferkamp; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists.

Authors:  D H Lui; J J McDonald; A de Beaux; B Tulloh; R R W Brady
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Widespread use of internet, applications, and social media in the professional life of urology residents.

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Martin Baunacke; Katharina Boehm; Julian Hanske; Andrew Macneily; Christian Meyer; Tim Nestler; Marianne Schmid; Johannes Huber
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The emerging role of social media in urology.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

Review 6.  The state and potential of social media in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A new wave of urologists? Graduating urology residents' practices of and attitudes toward social media.

Authors:  Kunal Jain; Michael B Fuoco; Gagan Fervaha; Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals.

Authors:  Mehmet Serkan Ozkent; Kadir Böcü; Emre Altintas; Murat Gul
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 9.  How Health Care Professionals Use Social Media to Create Virtual Communities: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Kaye Rolls; Margaret Hansen; Debra Jackson; Doug Elliott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Why We Belong - Exploring Membership of Healthcare Professionals in an Intensive Care Virtual Community Via Online Focus Groups: Rationale and Protocol.

Authors:  Kaye Rolls; Margaret Hansen; Debra Jackson; Doug Elliott
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.