Literature DB >> 26590917

The state and potential of social media in bladder cancer.

Michael J Leveridge1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social media sites and services have become intimately woven into our interpersonal communications and have begun to stake a visible place in healthcare. Disease-specific Twitter hashtags, online patient groups and participation by patients, practitioners and advocacy groups are emblematic of this new paradigm.
METHODS: A literature review and summary of resources and publications on bladder cancer and social media.
RESULTS: A majority of Western patients have access to and use the Internet for health information. Urologists and oncologists have used bladder-cancer-specific messaging at international meetings infrequently as compared to prostate and other non-urologic cancers. An active community does participate in online discussion, with differences between medical practitioners and patients/advocates. Advice is given with the aim of unifying this discussion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Oncology; Online patient community; Social media; Twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590917     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1725-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  14 in total

1.  Social media in clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael A Thompson
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

2.  Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Robert Abouassaly; Nadia Hackett; Ryan Groll; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials.

Authors:  Mai Frandsen; Julia Walters; Stuart G Ferguson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting.

Authors:  Noah E Canvasser; Christina Ramo; Todd M Morgan; Kai Zheng; Brent K Hollenbeck; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011.

Authors:  Aafia Chaudhry; L Michael Glodé; Matt Gillman; Robert S Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Fardod O'Kelly; Michael E Kelly; Nigel Phelan; Rustom P Manecksha; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists.

Authors:  Michael Fuoco; Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience.

Authors:  Isaac A Thangasamy; Michael Leveridge; Benjamin J Davies; Antonio Finelli; Brian Stork; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media.

Authors:  Yuya Sugawara; Hiroto Narimatsu; Atsushi Hozawa; Li Shao; Katsumi Otani; Akira Fukao
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-27

10.  Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Yeshe Fenner; Suzanne M Garland; Elya E Moore; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Ashley Fletcher; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Bharathy Gunasekaran; John D Wark
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evolving concepts in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Substantial utilization of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram in the prostate cancer community.

Authors:  J P Struck; F Siegel; M W Kramer; I Tsaur; A Heidenreich; A Haferkamp; A S Merseburger; J Salem; H Borgmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Examining Public Communication About Kidney Cancer on Twitter.

Authors:  Mina S Sedrak; Meghan M Salgia; Cristiane Decat Bergerot; Kemi Ashing-Giwa; Brendan N Cotta; Jacob J Adashek; Nazli Dizman; Andrew R Wong; Sumanta K Pal; Paulo Gustavo Bergerot
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-03

4.  Online Discussion on #KidneyStones: A Longitudinal Assessment of Activity, Users and Content.

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Matthew Bultitude; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Axel Haferkamp; Axel Heidenreich; Arkadiusz Miernik; Andreas Neisius; Thomas Knoll; Christian Thomas; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Urolithiasis on the Google Search Engine.

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Robert Abouassaly; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-12-04

Review 6.  Questioning reliability assessments of health information on social media.

Authors:  Nicole K Dalmer
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2017-01

7.  A Google Trends™ Analysis of Bladder Cancer: Determining Awareness Campaign Success, and Patients' Needs in Clinical Management.

Authors:  Aykut Demirci; Berat Cem Özgür
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  Perceived Unmet Needs in Patients Living With Advanced Bladder Cancer and Their Caregivers: Infodemiology Study Using Data From Social Media in the United States.

Authors:  Simon Renner; Paul Loussikian; Pierre Foulquié; Benoit Arnould; Alexia Marrel; Valentin Barbier; Adel Mebarki; Stéphane Schück; Murtuza Bharmal
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-09-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.