Literature DB >> 26664662

Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals.

Hendrik Borgmann1, Sasha DeWitt2, Igor Tsaur1, Axel Haferkamp1, Stacy Loeb1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Twitter use has grown exponentially within the urological community. We aimed to determine the perceptions of the impact of Twitter on users' clinical practice, research, and other professional activities.
METHODS: We performed an 11-item online survey of Twitter contributors during two major urological meetings: the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meetings. During the EAU 2014 meeting, we distributed the survey via the meeting official Twitter feed. During the AUA 2014 meeting, we applied a new method by directly sending the survey to Twitter contributors. We performed a subset analysis for assessing the perceived impact of Twitter on the clinical practice of physicians.
RESULTS: Among 312 total respondents, the greatest perceived benefits of Twitter among users were for networking (97%) and disseminating information (96%), followed by research (75%), advocacy (74%) and career development (62%). In total, 65% of Twitter users have dealt with guidelines on online medical professionalism and 71% of physician users found that Twitter had an impact on their clinical practice, and 33% had made a clinical decision based on an online case discussion.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Twitter users in the urological community perceive important benefits. These benefits extend to multiple professional domains, particularly networking, disseminating information, remote conference participation, research, and advocacy. This is the first study that has been disseminated to targeted individuals from the urological community directly through tweets, providing a proof of principle for this research method.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26664662      PMCID: PMC4662438          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  14 in total

1.  The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting.

Authors:  Noah E Canvasser; Christina Ramo; Todd M Morgan; Kai Zheng; Brent K Hollenbeck; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  European Association of Urology (@Uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Todd M Morgan; Peter J Bostrom; Matthew R Cooperberg; Alexander Kutikov; Kate D Linton; Joan Palou; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Henk van der Poel; Carl Wijburg; Andrew Winterbottom; Henry H Woo; Manfred P Wirth; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilkinson; Marnique Y Basto; Greta Perovic; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Social media offers unprecedented opportunities for vibrant exchange of professional ideas across continents.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; James Catto; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Fardod O'Kelly; Michael E Kelly; Nigel Phelan; Rustom P Manecksha; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists.

Authors:  Michael Fuoco; Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience.

Authors:  Isaac A Thangasamy; Michael Leveridge; Benjamin J Davies; Antonio Finelli; Brian Stork; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Stacy Loeb; Marnique Y Basto; Benjamin Challacombe; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mike Leveridge; Todd Morgan; Prokar Dasgupta; Matthew Bultitude
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Online Recruitment Methods for Web-Based and Mobile Health Studies: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Taylor S Lane; Julie Armin; Judith S Gordon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Breast Cancer Screening and Social Media: a Content Analysis of Evidence Use and Guideline Opinions on Twitter.

Authors:  Anthony Nastasi; Tyler Bryant; Joseph K Canner; Mark Dredze; Melissa S Camp; Neeraja Nagarajan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Widespread use of internet, applications, and social media in the professional life of urology residents.

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Martin Baunacke; Katharina Boehm; Julian Hanske; Andrew Macneily; Christian Meyer; Tim Nestler; Marianne Schmid; Johannes Huber
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Substantial utilization of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram in the prostate cancer community.

Authors:  J P Struck; F Siegel; M W Kramer; I Tsaur; A Heidenreich; A Haferkamp; A S Merseburger; J Salem; H Borgmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The Ethical and Professional Use of Social Media in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Nicholas L Berlin; Mark P MacEachern; Steven R Buchman; B Aviva Preminger; Christian J Vercler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Evaluation of Parental Perspectives and Concerns About Pediatric Tonsillectomy in Social Media.

Authors:  Tai Kyung Hairston; Anne R Links; Vandra Harris; David E Tunkel; Jonathan Walsh; Mary Catherine Beach; Emily F Boss
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  A new wave of urologists? Graduating urology residents' practices of and attitudes toward social media.

Authors:  Kunal Jain; Michael B Fuoco; Gagan Fervaha; Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  The Use of Social Media in Pediatric Urology-Forging New Paths or Crossing Boundaries?

Authors:  Hong Truong; Andrew Salib; Courtney K Rowe
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Junhan Chen; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals.

Authors:  Mehmet Serkan Ozkent; Kadir Böcü; Emre Altintas; Murat Gul
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.