Literature DB >> 24980084

Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping.

Owino Eloka1, Felix Feuerhake, Markus Janczyk, Volker H Franz.   

Abstract

The Perception-Action Model (PAM) claims to provide a coherent interpretation of data from all areas of the visual neurosciences, most notably data from neuropsychological patients and from behavioral experiments in healthy people. Here, we tested two claims that are part of the core version of the PAM: (a) certain actions (natural, highly practiced, and right-handed) are controlled by the dorsal vision for action pathway, while other actions (awkward, unpracticed, or left-handed) are controlled by the ventral vision for perception pathway. (b) Only the dorsal pathway operates in an analytical fashion, being able to selectively focus on the task-relevant dimension of an object (Ganel and Goodale, Nature 426(6967):664-667, 2003). We show that one of these claims must be wrong: using the same test for analytical processing as Ganel and Goodale (2003), we found that even an action that should clearly be ventral (left-handed awkward grasping) shows analytical processing just as a dorsal task does (right-handed natural precision grasping). These results are at odds with the PAM and point to an inconsistency of the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980084     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0585-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  INFORMATION REDUCTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF SEQUENTIAL TASKS.

Authors:  M I POSNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Franziska Landgraf; Marko Paelecke; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  Action without perception in human vision.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Planning movements well in advance.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Denise D J de Grave; Volker H Franz; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data?

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Volker Franz; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Mice move smoothly: irrelevant object variation affects perception, but not computer mouse actions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

2.  Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Tzvi Ganel; Caitlin M Byrne; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.