Literature DB >> 23955104

Mice move smoothly: irrelevant object variation affects perception, but not computer mouse actions.

Markus Janczyk1, Roland Pfister, Wilfried Kunde.   

Abstract

Human-Computer Interactions pose special demands on the motor system, especially regarding the virtual tool transformations underlying typical mouse movements. We investigated whether such virtual tool-transformed movements are similarly resistant to irrelevant variation of a target object as skilled natural movements are. Results show that such irrelevant information deteriorates performance in perceptual tasks, whereas movement parameters remain unaffected, suggesting that the control of virtual tools draws on the same mechanisms as natural actions do. The results are discussed in terms of their practical utility and recent findings investigating unskilled and transformed movements in the framework of the action/perception model and the integration of tools into the body schema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955104     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3671-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Franziska Landgraf; Marko Paelecke; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  Action without perception in human vision.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Planning movements well in advance.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Denise D J de Grave; Volker H Franz; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt; William Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality.

Authors:  Mel Slater; Bernhard Spanlang; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17

10.  Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion.

Authors:  Mel Slater; Daniel Perez-Marcos; H Henrik Ehrsson; Maria V Sanchez-Vives
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping.

Authors:  Owino Eloka; Felix Feuerhake; Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-01

2.  The function of "looking-at-nothing" for sequential sensorimotor tasks: Eye movements to remembered action-target locations.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 0.957

3.  Use of remote data collection methodology to test for an illusory effect on visually guided cursor movements.

Authors:  Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.