Literature DB >> 18608330

Planning movements well in advance.

Constanze Hesse1, Denise D J de Grave, Volker H Franz, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the metrics of grasping movements directed to visible objects are controlled in real time and are therefore unaffected by previous experience. We tested whether the properties of a visually presented distractor object influence the kinematics of a subsequent grasping movement performed under full vision. After viewing an elliptical distractor object in one of two different orientations participants grasped a target object, which was either the same object with the same orientation or a circular object without obvious orientation. When grasping the circular target, grip orientation was influenced by the orientation of the distractor. Moreover, as in classical visuomotor priming, grasping movements were initiated faster when distractor and target were identical. Results provide evidence that planning of visually guided grasping movements is influenced by prior perceptual experience, challenging the notion that metric aspects of grasping are controlled exclusively on the basis of real-time information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18608330     DOI: 10.1080/02643290701862399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping.

Authors:  Owino Eloka; Felix Feuerhake; Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-01

3.  Priming of the Sander Parallelogram illusion separates perception from action.

Authors:  Shannon A Senanayake; Tiffany Carther-Krone; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Urs Kleinholdermann; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Mice move smoothly: irrelevant object variation affects perception, but not computer mouse actions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of obstacles on grasp planning.

Authors:  Isabelle T Garzorz; Alexander G Knorr; Rene Gilster; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points?

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Eli Brenner; Willemijn D Schot; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grasping an object comfortably: orientation information is held in memory.

Authors:  K Roche; R Verheij; D Voudouris; H Chainay; J B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Impaired Motor Recycling during Action Selection in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Robin Smit; Bastiaan R Bloem; Ivan Toni; Rick C Helmich
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.