Literature DB >> 24978108

Calcium-mediated pore expansion and cell death following nanoelectroporation.

Olga N Pakhomova1, Betsy Gregory2, Iurii Semenov2, Andrei G Pakhomov2.   

Abstract

Opening of long-lived pores in the cell membrane is the principal primary effect of intense, nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF). Here we demonstrate that the evolution of pores, cell survival, the time and the mode of cell death (necrotic or apoptotic) are determined by the level of external Ca(2+) after nsPEF. We also introduce a novel, minimally disruptive technique for nsEP exposure of adherent cells on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass coverslips, which does not require cell detachment and enables fast exchanges of bath media. Increasing the Ca(2+) level from the nominal 2-5μM to 2mM for the first 60-90min after permeabilization by 300-nsPEF increased the early (necrotic) death in U937, CHO, and BPAE cells. With nominal Ca(2+), the inhibition of osmotic swelling rescued cells from the early necrosis and increased caspase 3/7 activation later on. However, the inhibition of swelling had a modest or no protective effect with 2mM Ca(2+) in the medium. With the nominal Ca(2+), most cells displayed gradual increase in YO-PRO-1 and propidium (Pr) uptake. With 2mM Ca(2+), the initially lower Pr uptake was eventually replaced by a massive and abrupt Pr entry (necrotic death). It was accompanied by a transient acceleration of the growth of membrane blebs due to the increase of the intracellular osmotic pressure. We conclude that the high-Ca(2+)-dependent necrotic death in nsPEF-treated cells is effected by a delayed, sudden, and osmotically-independent pore expansion (or de novo formation of larger pores), but not by the membrane rupture.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Calcium; Electropermeabilization; Electroporation; Nanosecond pulse; Necrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24978108      PMCID: PMC4125538          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  36 in total

1.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

2.  Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Juergen F Kolb; Jody A White; Ravindra P Joshi; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 3.  Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments.

Authors:  Marie Breton; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.010

4.  Disruption of the actin cortex contributes to susceptibility of mammalian cells to nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Gary L Thompson; Caleb Roth; Gleb Tolstykh; Marjorie Kuipers; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Modulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in chromaffin cells by nanoelectropulses.

Authors:  Gale L Craviso; Sophie Choe; Indira Chatterjee; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.373

6.  Nanoelectroablation of human pancreatic carcinoma in a murine xenograft model without recurrence.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Joanne Huynh; Kaying Lui; Ryan Wood; Mark Kreis; Brian Athos; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Rachael Shevin; Jody A White; Juergen F Kolb; Olga N Pakhomova; Ravindra P Joshi; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Electroporation-induced electrosensitization.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transient features in nanosecond pulsed electric fields differentially modulate mitochondria and viability.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Yeong-Jer Chen; Nova M Sain; Karl H Schoenbach; Shu Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two modes of cell death caused by exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Iurii Semenov; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  27 in total

1.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Sergey Grigoryev; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  [Protective effect of dexmedetomidine against glutamate-induced cytotoxicity in PC12 cells and its mechanism].

Authors:  Wei-Dong Zhang; Hao Zhang; Hai Wang; Na Zhang; Chun-Yan DU; Jun Yu; Ze-Guo Feng
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-02-20

3.  Effect of Cooling On Cell Volume and Viability After Nanoelectroporation.

Authors:  Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

5.  Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Control by Low Levels of Calcium of Mammalian Cell Membrane Electropermeabilization.

Authors:  Florin Ciobanu; Muriel Golzio; Eugenia Kovacs; Justin Teissié
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Delivery devices for exposure of biological cells to nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Malak Soueid; Martinus C F Dobbelaar; Sabrina Bentouati; Sylvia M Bardet; Rodney P O'Connor; Delphine Bessières; Jean Paillol; Philippe Leveque; Delia Arnaud-Cormos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Christian Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-22

10.  Neuronal excitation and permeabilization by 200-ns pulsed electric field: An optical membrane potential study with FluoVolt dye.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.