Kyle Q Lepage1, Mark A Kramer2, Catherine J Chu3. 1. Boston University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: lepage@math.bu.edu. 2. Boston University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mak@bu.edu. 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The electroencephalogram (EEG) remains the primary tool for diagnosis of abnormal brain activity in clinical neurology and for in vivo recordings of human neurophysiology in neuroscience research. In EEG data acquisition, voltage is measured at positions on the scalp with respect to a reference electrode. When this reference electrode responds to electrical activity or artifact all electrodes are affected. Successful analysis of EEG data often involves re-referencing procedures that modify the recorded traces and seek to minimize the impact of reference electrode activity upon functions of the original EEG recordings. NEW METHOD: We provide a novel, statistically robust procedure that adapts a robust maximum-likelihood type estimator to the problem of reference estimation, reduces the influence of neural activity from the re-referencing operation, and maintains good performance in a wide variety of empirical scenarios. RESULTS: The performance of the proposed and existing re-referencing procedures are validated in simulation and with examples of EEG recordings. To facilitate this comparison, channel-to-channel correlations are investigated theoretically and in simulation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The proposed procedure avoids using data contaminated by neural signal and remains unbiased in recording scenarios where physical references, the common average reference (CAR) and the reference estimation standardization technique (REST) are not optimal. CONCLUSION: The proposed procedure is simple, fast, and avoids the potential for substantial bias when analyzing low-density EEG data.
BACKGROUND: The electroencephalogram (EEG) remains the primary tool for diagnosis of abnormal brain activity in clinical neurology and for in vivo recordings of human neurophysiology in neuroscience research. In EEG data acquisition, voltage is measured at positions on the scalp with respect to a reference electrode. When this reference electrode responds to electrical activity or artifact all electrodes are affected. Successful analysis of EEG data often involves re-referencing procedures that modify the recorded traces and seek to minimize the impact of reference electrode activity upon functions of the original EEG recordings. NEW METHOD: We provide a novel, statistically robust procedure that adapts a robust maximum-likelihood type estimator to the problem of reference estimation, reduces the influence of neural activity from the re-referencing operation, and maintains good performance in a wide variety of empirical scenarios. RESULTS: The performance of the proposed and existing re-referencing procedures are validated in simulation and with examples of EEG recordings. To facilitate this comparison, channel-to-channel correlations are investigated theoretically and in simulation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The proposed procedure avoids using data contaminated by neural signal and remains unbiased in recording scenarios where physical references, the common average reference (CAR) and the reference estimation standardization technique (REST) are not optimal. CONCLUSION: The proposed procedure is simple, fast, and avoids the potential for substantial bias when analyzing low-density EEG data.
Authors: P L Nunez; R B Silberstein; Z Shi; M R Carpenter; R Srinivasan; D M Tucker; S M Doran; P J Cadusch; R S Wijesinghe Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Dezhong Yao; Li Wang; Robert Oostenveld; Kim Dremstrup Nielsen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Andrew C N Chen Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2005-02-09 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Catherine J Chu; Arthur Chan; Dan Song; Kevin J Staley; Steven M Stufflebeam; Mark A Kramer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Brian L Edlow; Camille Chatelle; Camille A Spencer; Catherine J Chu; Yelena G Bodien; Kathryn L O'Connor; Ronald E Hirschberg; Leigh R Hochberg; Joseph T Giacino; Eric S Rosenthal; Ona Wu Journal: Brain Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Dan Y Song; Sally M Stoyell; Erin E Ross; Lauren M Ostrowski; Emily L Thorn; Steven M Stufflebeam; Amy K Morgan; Britt C Emerton; Mark A Kramer; Catherine J Chu Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Yohan Céspedes-Villar; Juan David Martinez-Vargas; G Castellanos-Dominguez Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Jacob Hogan; Haoqi Sun; Luis Paixao; Mike Westmeijer; Pooja Sikka; Jing Jin; Ryan Tesh; Madalena Cardoso; Sydney S Cash; Oluwaseun Akeju; Robert Thomas; M Brandon Westover Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.708