Jacob Hogan1, Haoqi Sun1, Luis Paixao1, Mike Westmeijer1, Pooja Sikka1, Jing Jin1, Ryan Tesh1, Madalena Cardoso1, Sydney S Cash1, Oluwaseun Akeju2, Robert Thomas3, M Brandon Westover4. 1. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mwestover@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Brain Age Index (BAI), calculated from sleep electroencephalography (EEG), has been proposed as a biomarker of brain health. This study quantifies night-to-night variability of BAI and establishes probability thresholds for inferring underlying brain pathology based on a patient's BAI. METHODS: 86 patients with multiple nights of consecutive EEG recordings were selected from Epilepsy Monitoring Unit patients whose EEGs reported as within normal limits. While EEGs with epileptiform activity were excluded, the majority of patients included in the study had a diagnosis of chronic epilepsy. BAI was calculated for each 12-hour segment of patient data using a previously established algorithm, and the night-to-night variability in BAI was measured. RESULTS: The within-patient night-to-night standard deviation in BAI was 7.5 years. Estimates of BAI derived by averaging over 2, 3, and 4 nights had standard deviations of 4.7, 3.7, and 3.0 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Averaging BAI over n nights reduces night-to-night variability of BAI by a factor of n, rendering BAI a more suitable biomarker of brain health at the individual level. A brain age risk lookup table of results provides thresholds above which a patient has a high probability of excess BAI. SIGNIFICANCE: With increasing ease of EEG acquisition, including wearable technology, BAI has the potential to track brain health and detect deviations from normal physiologic function. The measure of night-to-night variability and how this is reduced by averaging across multiple nights provides a basis for using BAI in patients' homes to identify patients who should undergo further investigation or monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: Brain Age Index (BAI), calculated from sleep electroencephalography (EEG), has been proposed as a biomarker of brain health. This study quantifies night-to-night variability of BAI and establishes probability thresholds for inferring underlying brain pathology based on a patient's BAI. METHODS: 86 patients with multiple nights of consecutive EEG recordings were selected from Epilepsy Monitoring Unit patients whose EEGs reported as within normal limits. While EEGs with epileptiform activity were excluded, the majority of patients included in the study had a diagnosis of chronic epilepsy. BAI was calculated for each 12-hour segment of patient data using a previously established algorithm, and the night-to-night variability in BAI was measured. RESULTS: The within-patient night-to-night standard deviation in BAI was 7.5 years. Estimates of BAI derived by averaging over 2, 3, and 4 nights had standard deviations of 4.7, 3.7, and 3.0 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Averaging BAI over n nights reduces night-to-night variability of BAI by a factor of n, rendering BAI a more suitable biomarker of brain health at the individual level. A brain age risk lookup table of results provides thresholds above which a patient has a high probability of excess BAI. SIGNIFICANCE: With increasing ease of EEG acquisition, including wearable technology, BAI has the potential to track brain health and detect deviations from normal physiologic function. The measure of night-to-night variability and how this is reduced by averaging across multiple nights provides a basis for using BAI in patients' homes to identify patients who should undergo further investigation or monitoring.
Authors: Xiaoling Gao; Ali Azarbarzin; Brendan T Keenan; Michele Ostrowski; Frances M Pack; Bethany Staley; Greg Maislin; Allan I Pack; Magdy Younes; Samuel T Kuna Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Haoqi Sun; Luis Paixao; Jefferson T Oliva; Balaji Goparaju; Diego Z Carvalho; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Oluwaseun Akeju; Robert J Thomas; Sydney S Cash; Matt T Bianchi; M Brandon Westover Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Ulysses J Magalang; Ning-Hung Chen; Peter A Cistulli; Annette C Fedson; Thorarinn Gíslason; David Hillman; Thomas Penzel; Renaud Tamisier; Sergio Tufik; Gary Phillips; Allan I Pack Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Heidi Danker-Hopfe; Peter Anderer; Josef Zeitlhofer; Marion Boeck; Hans Dorn; Georg Gruber; Esther Heller; Erna Loretz; Doris Moser; Silvia Parapatics; Bernd Saletu; Andrea Schmidt; Georg Dorffner Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Thomas Neumann; Anne Katrin Baum; Ulrike Baum; Renate Deike; Helmut Feistner; Hermann Hinrichs; Joseph Stokes; Bernt-Peter Robra Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2018-05-21
Authors: Nalini M Singh; Jordan B Harrod; Sandya Subramanian; Mitchell Robinson; Ken Chang; Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak; Adrian Vasile Dalca; Simon Eickhoff; Michael Fox; Loraine Franke; Polina Golland; Daniel Haehn; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Lauren J O'Donnell; Yangming Ou; Yogesh Rathi; Shan H Siddiqi; Haoqi Sun; M Brandon Westover; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Randy L Gollub Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2022-03-28