Literature DB >> 20106746

On the recording reference contribution to EEG correlation, phase synchrony, and coherence.

Sanqing Hu1, Matt Stead, Qionghai Dai, Gregory A Worrell.   

Abstract

The degree of synchronization in electroencephalography (EEG) signals is commonly characterized by the time-series measures, namely, correlation, phase synchrony, and magnitude squared coherence (MSC). However, it is now well established that the interpretation of the results from these measures are confounded by the recording reference signal and that this problem is not mitigated by the use of other EEG montages, such as bipolar and average reference. In this paper, we analyze the impact of reference signal amplitude and power on EEG signal correlation, phase synchrony, and MSC. We show that, first, when two nonreferential signals have negative correlation, the phase synchrony and the absolute value of the correlation of the two referential signals may have two regions of behavior characterized by a monotonic decrease to zero and then a monotonic increase to one as the amplitude of the reference signal varies in [0, +∞). It is notable that even a small change of the amplitude may lead to significant impact on these two measures. Second, when two nonreferential signals have positive correlation, the correlation and phase-synchrony values of the two referential signals can monotonically increase to one (or monotonically decrease to some positive value and then monotonically increase to one) as the amplitude of the reference signal varies in [0, +∞). Third, when two nonreferential signals have negative cross-power, the MSC of the two referential signals can monotonically decrease to zero and then monotonically increase to one as reference signal power varies in [0, +∞). Fourth, when two nonreferential signals have positive cross-power, the MSC of the two referential signals can monotonically increase to one as the reference signal power varies in [0, +∞). In general, the reference signal with small amplitude or power relative to the signals of interest may decrease or increase the values of correlation, phase synchrony, and MSC. However, the reference signal with high relative amplitude or power will always increase each of the three measures. In our previous paper, we developed a method to identify and extract the reference signal contribution to intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings. In this paper, we apply this approach to referential iEEG recorded from human subjects and directly investigate the contribution of recording reference on correlation, phase synchrony, and MSC. The experimental results demonstrate the significant impact that the recording reference may have on these bivariate measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106746      PMCID: PMC2891575          DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2037237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern        ISSN: 1083-4419


  33 in total

1.  The effect of a scalp reference signal on coherence measurements of intracranial electroencephalograms.

Authors:  H P Zaveri; R B Duckrow; S S Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes.

Authors:  E Başar; C Başar-Eroglu; S Karakaş; M Schürmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Phase synchronization measurements using electroencephalographic recordings: what can we really say about neuronal synchrony?

Authors:  Ramón Guevara; José Luis Pérez Velazquez; Vera Nenadovic; Richard Wennberg; Goran Senjanovic; Luís Garcia Dominguez
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

4.  On the use of bipolar montages for time-series analysis of intracranial electroencephalograms.

Authors:  Hitten P Zaveri; Robert B Duckrow; Susan S Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  EEG phase synchronization during emotional response to positive and negative film stimuli.

Authors:  Tommaso Costa; Elena Rognoni; Dario Galati
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Variable grouping in multivariate time series via correlation.

Authors:  A Tucker; S Swift; X Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern       Date:  2001

8.  Coherence of gamma-band EEG activity as a basis for associative learning.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C Braun; M Arnold; H Witte; E Taub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Changes of EEG synchronization during low-frequency electric stimulation of the seizure onset zone.

Authors:  Kaspar Schindler; Christian E Elger; Klaus Lehnertz
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 3.045

10.  EEG phase synchronization in patients with paranoid schizophrenia.

Authors:  Petr Bob; Milan Palus; Marek Susta; Katerina Glaslova
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  17 in total

1.  Synchrony in normal and focal epileptic brain: the seizure onset zone is functionally disconnected.

Authors:  Christopher P Warren; Sanqing Hu; Matt Stead; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Mark R Bower; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Causality analysis of neural connectivity: critical examination of existing methods and advances of new methods.

Authors:  Sanqing Hu; Guojun Dai; Gregory A Worrell; Qionghai Dai; Hualou Liang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2011-04-19

3.  Reduced long-range functional connectivity in young children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Mitsuru Kikuchi; Yuko Yoshimura; Hirotoshi Hiraishi; Toshio Munesue; Takanori Hashimoto; Tsunehisa Tsubokawa; Tsutomu Takahashi; Michio Suzuki; Haruhiro Higashida; Yoshio Minabe
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  A unified treatment of the reference estimation problem in depth EEG recordings.

Authors:  Nilesh Madhu; Radu Ranta; Louis Maillard; Laurent Koessler
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Use of machine learning in predicting clinical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: A resting state electroencephalography study.

Authors:  Amin Zandvakili; Noah S Philip; Stephanie R Jones; Audrey R Tyrka; Benjamin D Greenberg; Linda L Carpenter
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  What does scalp electroencephalogram coherence tell us about long-range cortical networks?

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Deepa Issar; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Behavioral state classification in epileptic brain using intracranial electrophysiology.

Authors:  Vaclav Kremen; Juliano J Duque; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Brent M Berry; Michal T Kucewicz; Fatemeh Khadjevand; Jamie Van Gompel; Matt Stead; Erik K St Louis; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Leveraging electrophysiologic correlates of word encoding to map seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy: Task-dependent changes in epileptiform activity, spectral features, and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Krishnakant V Saboo; Irena Balzekas; Vaclav Kremen; Yogatheesan Varatharajah; Michal Kucewicz; Ravishankar K Iyer; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  The functional organization of human epileptic hippocampus.

Authors:  Petr Klimes; Juliano J Duque; Ben Brinkmann; Jamie Van Gompel; Matt Stead; Erik K St Louis; Josef Halamek; Pavel Jurak; Gregory Worrell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A statistically robust EEG re-referencing procedure to mitigate reference effect.

Authors:  Kyle Q Lepage; Mark A Kramer; Catherine J Chu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.