Literature DB >> 24968311

Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: an Interactive Account of attentional biases.

Luca Rinaldi1, Samuel Di Luca2, Avishai Henik3, Luisa Girelli4.   

Abstract

A growing amount of evidence confirms the influence of reading and writing habits on visuospatial processing, although this phenomenon has been so far testified mainly as a lateralized shift of a single behavioral sign (e.g., line bisection), with lack of proof from pure right-to-left readers. The present study contributed to this issue by analyzing multiple attentional and motor indexes in monolingual Italian (i.e., reading from left-to-right), and monolingual (i.e., reading from right-to-left) and bilingual Israeli (i.e., reading from right-to-left in Hebrew but also from left-to-right in English) participants' visuospatial performance. Subjects were administered a computerized standard star cancellation task and a modified version in which English letters and words were replaced by Hebrew ones. Tasks were presented on a graphics tablet, allowing recording of both chronometric and spatial parameters (i.e., measured in (x, y) vector coordinates). Results showed that reading direction modulated the on-line visuomotor performance (i.e., left-to-right vs. right-to-left shifts) from the beginning (i.e., first mark) to the end of the task (i.e., spatial distribution of omissions and subjective epicenter). Additionally, the spatial bias observed in a computerized line bisection task was also related to the participants' habitual reading direction. Overall, the results favor the proposal of an Interactive Account of visuospatial asymmetries, according to which both cultural factors, such as the directional scanning associated with language processing, and biological factors, such as hemispheric specialization, modulate visuospatial processing. Results are discussed in light of recent behavioral and neuroanatomical findings.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancellation task; Hemispheric specialization; Line bisection task; Reading habits; Visuospatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24968311     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  16 in total

1.  Time in the eye of the beholder: Gaze position reveals spatial-temporal associations during encoding and memory retrieval of future and past.

Authors:  Corinna S Martarelli; Fred W Mast; Matthias Hartmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

2.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brain activity in the prefrontal cortex during a cancellation task: effects of the target-to-distractor ratio.

Authors:  Koji Yano; Akira Yasumura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Unstable world: Recent experience affects spatial perception.

Authors:  Emily Rosenich; Samuel Shaki; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

5.  Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  Observation of directional storybook reading influences young children's counting direction.

Authors:  Silke M Göbel; Koleen McCrink; Martin H Fischer; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-08-31

7.  Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane - a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Silke M Göbel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-10

8.  Native reading direction influences lateral biases in the perception of shape from shading.

Authors:  Austen K Smith; Izabela Szelest; Trista E Friedrich; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 9.  How space-number associations may be created in preliterate children: six distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Katarzyna Patro; Ulrike Cress; Ulrike Schild; Claudia K Friedrich; Silke M Göbel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-05

Review 10.  Is Beauty in the Hand of the Writer? Influences of Aesthetic Preferences through Script Directions, Cultural, and Neurological Factors: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Alexander G Page; Chris McManus; Carmen P González; Sobh Chahboun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.