Literature DB >> 34291314

Brain activity in the prefrontal cortex during a cancellation task: effects of the target-to-distractor ratio.

Koji Yano1,2, Akira Yasumura3.   

Abstract

Cancellation tasks have been widely used to neurologically assess selective attention and visual search in various clinical and research settings. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the effect of the level of task difficulty on brain activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). This study implemented cancellation tasks to investigate the effects of varying task difficulty on oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) concentrations. Data from 21 healthy adults were analyzed based on performance during three-block-design types of cancellation tasks with different T/D ratios (i.e., 1/9, 2/8, and 3/7). Performance was assessed via the number of correct responses, incorrect responses, hit ratios, achievement ratios, and performance scores (PS), while PFC activity was examined using near-infrared spectroscopy. Both the numbers of correct responses and PS were the lowest for the smallest T/D ratio. Similarly, we observed that the oxy-Hb concentration in the PFC was significantly increased during the task. Our results support the findings of previous studies that used conventional cancellation tasks, thus suggesting that block design types are suitable for examinations in the same contexts. Regarding the above-mentioned changes in the oxy-Hb concentration, the findings suggest that the PFC region is involved in selective attention.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords:  Cancellation task; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Prefrontal cortex; Selective attention; Visual search

Year:  2021        PMID: 34291314     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06177-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Cancellation task in very low educated people.

Authors:  Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki; Ricardo Nitrini
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia.

Authors:  Ho-Chuan Huang; Tsui-Ying Wang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05

3.  Visualized representation of visual search patterns for a visuospatial attention test.

Authors:  Ho-Chuan Huang; Tsui-Ying Wang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-05

4.  Visual search and attention in five-year-old very preterm/very low birth weight children.

Authors:  Christiaan J A Geldof; Jorrit F de Kieviet; Marjolein Dik; Joke H Kok; Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Jaap Oosterlaan
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of stimulus number and target-to-distractor ratio on the performance of random array letter cancellation tasks.

Authors:  D S Geldmacher
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks.

Authors:  Samuel Di Luca; Mauro Pesenti; Giuseppe Vallar; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and developmental right-hemisphere syndrome: congruence and incongruence of cognitive and behavioral aspects of attention.

Authors:  Y E Landau; V Gross-Tsur; J G Auerbach; J Van der Meere; R S Shalev
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 8.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Asymmetrical visual-spatial attention in college students diagnosed with ADD/ADHD.

Authors:  Kelly E Jones; Catherine Craver-Lemley; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Functional MRI of Letter Cancellation Task Performance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ivy D Deng; Luke Chung; Natasha Talwar; Fred Tam; Nathan W Churchill; Tom A Schweizer; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.