Literature DB >> 24965916

Bilateral breast MRI by use of dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation and image-based shimming at 3 Tesla: improvement in homogeneity on fat-suppression imaging.

Kinya Ishizaka1, Fumi Kato, Satoshi Terae, Suzuko Mito, Noriko Oyama-Manabe, Tamotsu Kamishima, Mitsuhiro Nakanishi, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Hiroyuki Hamaguchi, Hiroki Shirato.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare fat-suppression homogeneity on breast MR imaging by using dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation and image-based shimming (DS-IBS) with single-source radiofrequency excitation with volume shim (SS-Vol) at 3 Tesla. Twenty patients were included. Axial three-dimensional T1-weighted turbo-field-echo breast images with DS-IBS and SS-Vol were obtained. Fat suppression was scored with four grade points. The contrast of the pectoral muscle and the fat in each breast area was obtained in the head medial, head lateral, foot medial, and foot lateral areas. The axillary space was calculated and compared between DS-IBS and SS-Vol. The average DS-IBS score was significantly higher than that of SS-Vol. The mean contrasts of fat in the foot lateral areas and axillary spaces on DS-IBS images were significantly higher than on SS-Vol images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965916     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-014-0278-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  21 in total

1.  Strategies for shimming the breast.

Authors:  Nimrod Maril; Christopher M Collins; Robert L Greenman; Robert E Lenkinski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hendrik Kooijman; Juergen Gieseke; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging.

Authors:  G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  A comparison of shimming techniques for optimizing fat suppression in MR mammography.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Kengo Nishiyama; Tosiaki Miyati; Hideto Miyano; Mariko Kajihara; Thai Akasaka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 5.  Fat suppression techniques in MRI: an update.

Authors:  E de Kerviler; A Leroy-Willig; O Clément; J Frija
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 6.  Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; W Hänicke; D Matthaei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Kyunghyun Sung; Bruce L Daniel; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Dual-source parallel RF transmission for clinical MR imaging of the spine at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison with conventional single-source transmission.

Authors:  Michael Nelles; Roy S König; Jürgen Gieseke; Marjolijn M Guerand-van Battum; Guido M Kukuk; Hans H Schild; Winfried A Willinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.