Literature DB >> 20027567

Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging.

Thorsten A Bley1, Oliver Wieben, Christopher J François, Jean H Brittain, Scott B Reeder.   

Abstract

A wide variety of fat suppression and water-fat separation methods are used to suppress fat signal and improve visualization of abnormalities. This article reviews the most commonly used techniques for fat suppression and fat-water imaging including 1) chemically selective fat suppression pulses "FAT-SAT"; 2) spatial-spectral pulses (water excitation); 3) short inversion time (TI) inversion recovery (STIR) imaging; 4) chemical shift based water-fat separation methods; and finally 5) fat suppression and balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences. The basic physical background of these techniques including their specific advantages and disadvantages is given and related to clinical applications. This enables the reader to understand the reasons why some fat suppression methods work better than others in specific clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20027567     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  103 in total

1.  Liver acquisition with volume acceleration flex on 70-cm wide-bore and 60-cm conventional-bore 3.0-T MRI.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Saito; Keiko Tanaka; Takashi Hashido
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-01-06

Review 2.  Invisible fat on CT: making it visible by MRI.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.

Authors:  J P Dillenseger; S Molière; P Choquet; C Goetz; M Ehlinger; G Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Dixon technique and the frequency-selective fat suppression technique in three-dimensional T1 weighted MRI of the liver: a comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of hepatocellular carcinomas-to-liver.

Authors:  Y Takatsu; T Akasaka; T Miyati
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Quantitative proton MR techniques for measuring fat.

Authors:  H H Hu; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A rapid 3D fat-water decomposition method using globally optimal surface estimation (R-GOOSE).

Authors:  Chen Cui; Abhay Shah; Xiaodong Wu; Mathews Jacob
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  MR quantitative biomarkers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: technical evolutions and future trends.

Authors:  Guido Ligabue; Giulia Besutti; Riccardo Scaglioni; Chiara Stentarelli; Giovanni Guaraldi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-08

9.  Characterizing the limits of MRI near metallic prostheses.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Curtis Wiens; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Quantitative imaging of lipid droplets in single cells.

Authors:  Anushka Gupta; Gabriel F Dorlhiac; Aaron M Streets
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.