Literature DB >> 24955150

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

Marco Cicciu1, Ennio Bramanti2, Giada Matacena2, Eugenio Guglielmino3, Giacomo Risitano3.   

Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FEM analysis; bone tissue; dental implant; load

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955150      PMCID: PMC4057829     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  17 in total

1.  Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit.

Authors:  R Pietrabissa; R Contro; V Quaglini; M Soncini; L Gionso; M Simion
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants.

Authors:  Dinçer Bozkaya; Sinan Müftü
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kitagawa; Yasuhiro Tanimoto; Misako Odaki; Kimiya Nemoto; Masahiro Aida
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method.

Authors:  L Boschian Pest; S Guidotti; R Pietrabissa; M Gagliani
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible.

Authors:  Jehad Al-Sukhun; Christian Lindqvist; Miia Helenius
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.

Authors:  Rudi C van Staden; Hong Guan; Newell W Johnson; Yew-Chaye Loo; Neil Meredith
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants.

Authors:  Göran Bergkvist; Kjell Simonsson; Kristofer Rydberg; Fredrik Johansson; Tore Dérand
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.932

8.  Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system.

Authors:  M Cicciù; G Risitano; C Maiorana; G Franceschini
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

9.  Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.

Authors:  M Cicciù; M Beretta; G Risitano; C Maiorana
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2008-04

10.  Homogenized stress analysis in a dental implant system.

Authors:  H J Moon; J H Lee; K Choi; J B Choi; C S Koh
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec
View more
  30 in total

1.  Radiographical and clinical evaluation of critical size defects in rabbit calvaria filled with allograft and autograft: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Oporto V; Ramón Fuentes; Eduardo Borie; Mariano Del Sol; Iara Augusta Orsi; Wilfried Engelke
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

2.  Impact of Dynamic Loading on the Implant-abutment Interface Using a Gas-enhanced Permeation Test In Vitro.

Authors:  Anas Al-Jadaa; Thomas Attin; Timo Peltomäki; Christian Heumann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Clinical and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of LED and Laser Activated Teeth Bleaching.

Authors:  R Lo Giudice; G Pantaleo; A Lizio; U Romeo; G Castiello; G Spagnuolo; G Lo Giudice
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 4.  Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Keshk; Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi; Radhwan S Algabri; Mostafa S Swedan; Amal Kaddah
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Abutment misfit in implant-supported prostheses manufactured by casting technique: An integrative review.

Authors:  Lorena M S Pereira; Mariane B Sordi; Ricardo S Magini; Antônio R Calazans Duarte; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Ho Yeol Jang; Su Young Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods.

Authors:  M Cicciù; G Cervino; E Bramanti; F Lauritano; G Lo Gudice; L Scappaticci; A Rapparini; E Guglielmino; G Risitano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Mechanical and biological complication rates of the modified lateral-screw-retained implant prosthesis in the posterior region: an alternative to the conventional Implant prosthetic system.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Jong-Bin Lee; Man-Yong Kim; Joon-Ho Yoon; Seong-Ho Choi; Young-Taek Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  The analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant and conventional fixed dental prosthesis.

Authors:  June Sang Chun; Alix Har; Hyun-Pil Lim; Hoi-Jeong Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  New dental implant selection criterion based on implant design.

Authors:  Mohamed I El-Anwar; Mohamed M El-Zawahry; Eman M Ibraheem; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Hisham ElGabry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.