Literature DB >> 18254739

A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants.

Göran Bergkvist1, Kjell Simonsson, Kristofer Rydberg, Fredrik Johansson, Tore Dérand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies on one-stage surgery in the treatment of the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported fixed prostheses have reported problems with removable provisional prostheses, which can load the implants in an uncontrollable manner during healing, and jeopardize healing. Immediate splinting of the implants with a fixed provisional prosthesis has been proposed to protect the bone-implant interface.
PURPOSE: This study used the finite element method (FEM) to simulate stresses induced in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled and splinted implants in the maxilla because of bite force loading, and to determine whether the differences in these stress levels are related to differences in observed bone losses associated with the two healing methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stress levels in the maxilla were studied using the FEM program TRINITAS (Institute of Technology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden) in which all phases - preprocessing/modeling, equation solving, and postprocessing/evaluation - were simulated.
RESULTS: Stress levels in bone tissue surrounding splinted implants were markedly lower than stress levels surrounding uncoupled implants by a factor of nearly 9.
CONCLUSION: From a mechanical viewpoint, FEM simulation supports the hypothesis that splinting reduces damage evolution in bone tissue, which agrees with clinical observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18254739     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  9 in total

1.  FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

Authors:  Marco Cicciu; Ennio Bramanti; Giada Matacena; Eugenio Guglielmino; Giacomo Risitano
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  FEM and Von Mises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution.

Authors:  M Cicciù; E Bramanti; F Cecchetti; L Scappaticci; E Guglielmino; G Risitano
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

3.  Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takumi Hasegawa; Aki Sasaki; Izumi Saito; Satomi Arimoto; Nanae Yatagai; Yujiro Hiraoka; Daisuke Takeda; Yasumasa Kakei; Masaya Akashi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Toledano; Enrique Fernández-Romero; Cristina Vallecillo; Raquel Toledano; María T Osorio; Marta Vallecillo-Rivas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 5.  Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Zeinab Rezaei Esfahrood; Loghman Ahmadi; Elahe Karami; Shima Asghari
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM ® Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads.

Authors:  Gabriele Cervino; Umberto Romeo; Floriana Lauritano; Ennio Bramanti; Luca Fiorillo; Cesare D'Amico; Dario Milone; Luigi Laino; Francesco Campolongo; Silvia Rapisarda; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.

Authors:  Lana Zupancic Cepic; Martin Frank; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter Pahr; Werner Zechner; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods.

Authors:  M Cicciù; G Cervino; E Bramanti; F Lauritano; G Lo Gudice; L Scappaticci; A Rapparini; E Guglielmino; G Risitano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Evaluation of two interforaminal implants and implant-assisted removable dentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Selda Arat Bilhan; Onur Geckili; Altug Cilingir; Ergun Bozdag; Hakan Bilhan
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.