Literature DB >> 2271265

Do our patients receive maximum benefit from preventive care? A North American perspective.

W W Rosser1, H Lamberts.   

Abstract

Politicians, their constituents and family physicians believe that preventive medicine is essential if health care is to be improved. Family physicians believe that the majority of their patients are well cared for with preventive health care services but in reality preventive services are provided to less than half the population and some to fewer than 10%. Barriers to providing preventive care include the selection of procedures of unproven effectiveness, public unawareness of the benefits of the procedure and practical obstacles for physicians providing the services. Assessment of each of these barriers indicates how preventive care can be improved. Narrowing the gap between what we believe about preventive care and the level of preventive services we are providing could improve the health of our nations. However, the concept of primum non nocere must dominate the assessment of currently advocated preventive procedures and the consideration of new procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2271265      PMCID: PMC1371386     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  38 in total

1.  A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The hypertensive patient: 2. Finding and linking to clinical care.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-06-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Sir John Scott Burdon-Sanderson (1828-1905): a pioneer in electrophysiology.

Authors:  M C Rogers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; N J Birkett; J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; M E Johnston; S A Hewson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.

Authors:  T M Gerace; J F Sangster
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Population medicine and individual medicine.

Authors:  G D Forwell
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  The impact of an organized approach to prevention.

Authors:  J F Sangster
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Effect of general practitioners' advice against smoking.

Authors:  M A Russell; C Wilson; C Taylor; C D Baker
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-07-28

10.  Health promotion in primary care: a survey of U.S. family practitioners.

Authors:  C T Orleans; L K George; J L Houpt; K H Brodie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  2 in total

1.  Practice organization before and after the new contract: a survey of general practices in Sheffield.

Authors:  D R Hannay; T P Usherwood; M Platts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature.

Authors:  D Snadden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.