Literature DB >> 24953242

Discovering beaten paths in collaborative ontology-engineering projects using Markov chains.

Simon Walk1, Philipp Singer2, Markus Strohmaier3, Tania Tudorache4, Mark A Musen4, Natalya F Noy4.   

Abstract

Biomedical taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies in the form of the International Classification of Diseases as a taxonomy or the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus as an OWL-based ontology, play a critical role in acquiring, representing and processing information about human health. With increasing adoption and relevance, biomedical ontologies have also significantly increased in size. For example, the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, which is currently under active development by the World Health Organization contains nearly 50,000 classes representing a vast variety of different diseases and causes of death. This evolution in terms of size was accompanied by an evolution in the way ontologies are engineered. Because no single individual has the expertise to develop such large-scale ontologies, ontology-engineering projects have evolved from small-scale efforts involving just a few domain experts to large-scale projects that require effective collaboration between dozens or even hundreds of experts, practitioners and other stakeholders. Understanding the way these different stakeholders collaborate will enable us to improve editing environments that support such collaborations. In this paper, we uncover how large ontology-engineering projects, such as the International Classification of Diseases in its 11th revision, unfold by analyzing usage logs of five different biomedical ontology-engineering projects of varying sizes and scopes using Markov chains. We discover intriguing interaction patterns (e.g., which properties users frequently change after specific given ones) that suggest that large collaborative ontology-engineering projects are governed by a few general principles that determine and drive development. From our analysis, we identify commonalities and differences between different projects that have implications for project managers, ontology editors, developers and contributors working on collaborative ontology-engineering projects and tools in the biomedical domain.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaboration; Collaborative ontology engineering; Markov chains; Ontology-engineering tool; Sequential patterns; User interface

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24953242      PMCID: PMC4194274          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  9 in total

1.  State of the art and open challenges in community-driven knowledge curation.

Authors:  Tudor Groza; Tania Tudorache; Michel Dumontier
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  How Ontologies are Made: Studying the Hidden Social Dynamics Behind Collaborative Ontology Engineering Projects.

Authors:  Markus Strohmaier; Simon Walk; Jan Pöschko; Daniel Lamprecht; Tania Tudorache; Csongor Nyulas; Mark A Musen; Natalya F Noy
Journal:  Web Semant       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.897

3.  NCI Thesaurus: a semantic model integrating cancer-related clinical and molecular information.

Authors:  Nicholas Sioutos; Sherri de Coronado; Margaret W Haber; Frank W Hartel; Wen-Ling Shaiu; Lawrence W Wright
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  The Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable resource discovery in clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Jessica D Tenenbaum; Patricia L Whetzel; Kent Anderson; Charles D Borromeo; Ivo D Dinov; Davera Gabriel; Beth Kirschner; Barbara Mirel; Tim Morris; Natasha Noy; Csongor Nyulas; David Rubenson; Paul R Saxman; Harpreet Singh; Nancy Whelan; Zach Wright; Brian D Athey; Michael J Becich; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Mark A Musen; Kevin A Smith; Alice F Tarantal; Daniel L Rubin; Peter Lyster
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  PragmatiX: An Interactive Tool for Visualizing the Creation Process Behind Collaboratively Engineered Ontologies.

Authors:  Simon Walk; Jan Pöschko; Markus Strohmaier; Keith Andrews; Tania Tudorache; Natalya F Noy; Csongor Nyulas; Mark A Musen
Journal:  Int J Semant Web Inf Syst       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.843

6.  WebProtégé: A Collaborative Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition Tool for the Web.

Authors:  Tania Tudorache; Csongor Nyulas; Natalya F Noy; Mark A Musen
Journal:  Semant Web       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Predicting the extension of biomedical ontologies.

Authors:  Catia Pesquita; Francisco M Couto
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Identification of hot regions in protein-protein interactions by sequential pattern mining.

Authors:  Chen-Ming Hsu; Chien-Yu Chen; Baw-Jhiune Liu; Chih-Chang Huang; Min-Hung Laio; Chien-Chieh Lin; Tzung-Lin Wu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Detecting memory and structure in human navigation patterns using Markov chain models of varying order.

Authors:  Philipp Singer; Denis Helic; Behnam Taraghi; Markus Strohmaier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Analyzing user interactions with biomedical ontologies: A visual perspective.

Authors:  Maulik R Kamdar; Simon Walk; Tania Tudorache; Mark A Musen
Journal:  Web Semant       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 1.897

2.  Analysis and Prediction of User Editing Patterns in Ontology Development Projects.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Tania Tudorache; Dejing Dou; Natalya F Noy; Mark A Musen
Journal:  J Data Semant       Date:  2015-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.