AIMS: The US Food and Drug Administration must consider whether to ban the use of menthol in cigarettes. This study examines how current smokers might respond to such a ban on menthol cigarettes. DESIGN: Convenience sample of adolescent and adult smokers recruited from an online survey panel. SETTING: United States, 2010. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 471 adolescent and adult current cigarette smokers. MEASUREMENTS: Respondents were asked a series of questions about how they might react if menthol cigarettes were banned. In addition, participants completed a simulation purchase task to estimate the demand for menthol and non-menthol cigarettes across a range of prices. FINDINGS: Overall, 36.1% of respondents said they always (18.9%) or usually (17.2%) smoked menthol cigarettes. When asked how they might respond to a ban on menthol cigarettes, 35% of current menthol smokers said they would stop smoking, and 25% said they would 'find a way to buy a menthol brand'. Those who reported they might quit tended to have greater current intentions to quit [odds ratio (OR) = 4.47], while those who reported that they might seek illicit menthol cigarettes were far less likely to report current intentions to quit (OR = 0.06). Estimates for demand elasticity for preferred cigarette type were similar for menthol (α = 0.0051) and non-menthol (α = 0.0049) smokers. Demand elasticity and peak consumption were related to usual cigarette type and cigarettes smoked per day, but did not appear to differ by race, gender or age. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that a significant minority of smokers of menthol cigarettes in the United States would try to stop smoking altogether if such cigarettes were banned.
AIMS: The US Food and Drug Administration must consider whether to ban the use of menthol in cigarettes. This study examines how current smokers might respond to such a ban on menthol cigarettes. DESIGN: Convenience sample of adolescent and adult smokers recruited from an online survey panel. SETTING: United States, 2010. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 471 adolescent and adult current cigarette smokers. MEASUREMENTS: Respondents were asked a series of questions about how they might react if menthol cigarettes were banned. In addition, participants completed a simulation purchase task to estimate the demand for menthol and non-menthol cigarettes across a range of prices. FINDINGS: Overall, 36.1% of respondents said they always (18.9%) or usually (17.2%) smoked menthol cigarettes. When asked how they might respond to a ban on menthol cigarettes, 35% of current menthol smokers said they would stop smoking, and 25% said they would 'find a way to buy a menthol brand'. Those who reported they might quit tended to have greater current intentions to quit [odds ratio (OR) = 4.47], while those who reported that they might seek illicit menthol cigarettes were far less likely to report current intentions to quit (OR = 0.06). Estimates for demand elasticity for preferred cigarette type were similar for menthol (α = 0.0051) and non-menthol (α = 0.0049) smokers. Demand elasticity and peak consumption were related to usual cigarette type and cigarettes smoked per day, but did not appear to differ by race, gender or age. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that a significant minority of smokers of menthol cigarettes in the United States would try to stop smoking altogether if such cigarettes were banned.
Authors: James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: John A Tauras; David Levy; Frank J Chaloupka; Andrea Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Donna Vallone; David B Abrams Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: James G Murphy; James MacKillop; Jennifer W Tidey; Linda A Brazil; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Sherry L Emery; Susan Ennett; Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes; John C Scott; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karin A Kasza; Andrew J Hyland; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Lisa M Vogl; Jiping Chen; Sarah E Evans; Geoffrey T Fong; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Michael Chaiton; Robert Schwartz; Joanna E Cohen; Eric Soule; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael O Chaiton; Ioana Nicolau; Robert Schwartz; Joanna E Cohen; Eric Soule; Bo Zhang; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Ollie Ganz; Yitong Zhou; Brittany E Carnegie; Andrea C Villanti; Jessica Rath; Elizabeth C Hair Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrew A Strasser; Rebecca L Ashare; Madeline Kaufman; Kathy Z Tang; A Clementina Mesaros; Ian A Blair Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 4.254