Richard J O'Connor1, Bryan W Heckman2, Sarah E Adkison3, Vaughan W Rees4, Dorothy K Hatsukami5, Warren K Bickel6, K Michael Cummings2. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA. richard.oconnor@roswellpark.org. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina & Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA. 4. Center for Global Tobacco Control, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Virginia Tech Carillion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The cigarette purchase task (CPT) is a method that can be used to assess the relative value of cigarettes. Based on cigarettes purchased across a price range, five derived metrics (Omax, Pmax, breakpoint, intensity, and elasticity) can assess cigarette demand. A study with adolescent smokers found that these could be reduced to two latent factors: persistence (price insensitivity) and amplitude (volumetric consumption). We sought to replicate this structure with adult smokers and examine how these variables relate to cessation efforts. METHOD: Web-based survey conducted in 2014 among adult (18 years and above) current daily cigarette smokers (N = 1194). Participants completed the CPT, Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), reported past-year quit attempts, and future quit intentions. We included published scales assessing perceived prevalence of smoking, social reactivity, smoker identity, and risk perception. RESULTS: Our analysis supported two latent variables, persistence and amplitude, which correlated positively with FTND. Persistence was correlated with several psychosocial factors and was higher among those intending to quit very soon, but did not vary by number of past-year quit attempts. Amplitude differed across quit attempts and intention (p < 0.001) and, in multivariable models, was significantly associated with lower 30-day quit intention (OR = 0.76, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence and amplitude factors characterized CPT data in adults, discriminated known groups (e.g., smokers by intentions to quit), and were positively associated with nicotine dependence. Factor scores also appear to relate to certain psychosocial factors, such as smoker identity and perceptions of risk. Future research should examine the predictive validity of these constructs.
INTRODUCTION: The cigarette purchase task (CPT) is a method that can be used to assess the relative value of cigarettes. Based on cigarettes purchased across a price range, five derived metrics (Omax, Pmax, breakpoint, intensity, and elasticity) can assess cigarette demand. A study with adolescent smokers found that these could be reduced to two latent factors: persistence (price insensitivity) and amplitude (volumetric consumption). We sought to replicate this structure with adult smokers and examine how these variables relate to cessation efforts. METHOD: Web-based survey conducted in 2014 among adult (18 years and above) current daily cigarette smokers (N = 1194). Participants completed the CPT, Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), reported past-year quit attempts, and future quit intentions. We included published scales assessing perceived prevalence of smoking, social reactivity, smoker identity, and risk perception. RESULTS: Our analysis supported two latent variables, persistence and amplitude, which correlated positively with FTND. Persistence was correlated with several psychosocial factors and was higher among those intending to quit very soon, but did not vary by number of past-year quit attempts. Amplitude differed across quit attempts and intention (p < 0.001) and, in multivariable models, was significantly associated with lower 30-day quit intention (OR = 0.76, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence and amplitude factors characterized CPT data in adults, discriminated known groups (e.g., smokers by intentions to quit), and were positively associated with nicotine dependence. Factor scores also appear to relate to certain psychosocial factors, such as smoker identity and perceptions of risk. Future research should examine the predictive validity of these constructs.
Authors: James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: James Mackillop; James G Murphy; Jennifer W Tidey; Christopher W Kahler; Lara A Ray; Warren K Bickel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tyler D Nighbor; Anthony J Barrows; Janice Y Bunn; Michael J DeSarno; Anthony C Oliver; Sulamunn R M Coleman; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Ellaina N Reed; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; Sara Hitchman; Richard J O'Connor; Warren K Bickel; Jeffrey S Stein; Hua-Hie Yong; Georges J Nahhas; Derek A Pope; Ce Shang; Kai-Wen Cheng; David T Levy; K Michael Cummings Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Cecilia L Bergeria; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Andrea C Villanti; John R Hughes; Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Sarah H Heil; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Jeff S Priest; Joan M Skelly; Derek D Reed; Janice Y Bunn; Morgan A Tromblee; Christopher A Arger; Mollie E Miller Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; Gema Aonso-Diego; Sara Weidberg; José R Fernández-Hermida Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; K Michael Cummings; Georges J Nahas; Marc C Willemsen; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Borland; Alexander A Hirsch; Warren K Bickel; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.244