Literature DB >> 24949846

Dynamic ultrasound imaging applications to quantify musculoskeletal function.

Siddhartha Sikdar1, Qi Wei, Nelson Cortes.   

Abstract

Advances in imaging methods have led to new capability to study muscle and tendon motion in vivo. Direct measurements of muscle and tendon kinematics using imaging may lead to improved understanding of musculoskeletal function. This review presents quantitative ultrasound methods for muscle dynamics that can be used to assess in vivo musculoskeletal function when integrated with other conventional biomechanical measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24949846      PMCID： PMC4066199          DOI： 10.1249/JES.0000000000000015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev        ISSN： 0091-6331            Impact factor:   6.230


  43 in total

1.  Real-time imaging of skeletal muscle velocity.

Authors:  Deanna S Asakawa; Krishna S Nayak; Silvia S Blemker; Scott L Delp; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Measurement of ventricular torsion by two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging.

Authors:  Yuichi Notomi; Peter Lysyansky; Randolph M Setser; Takahiro Shiota; Zoran B Popović; Maureen G Martin-Miklovic; Joan A Weaver; Stephanie J Oryszak; Neil L Greenberg; Richard D White; James D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Measurement of tendon velocities using vector tissue Doppler imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Avinash Eranki; Lindsey Bellini; Laura Prosser; Christopher Stanley; Daniel Bland; Katharine Alter; Diane Damiano; Siddhartha Sikdar
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

4.  Rectus femoris knee muscle moment arms measured in vivo during dynamic motion with real-time magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Jonathan S Lin; Kathryn B Ridder; Michael A Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Quadriceps femoris muscle morphology and function after ACL injury: a differential response in copers versus non-copers.

Authors:  Glenn N Williams; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Peter J Barrance; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Fibre operating lengths of human lower limb muscles during walking.

Authors:  Edith M Arnold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Skeletal muscle contraction in healthy volunteers: assessment with Doppler tissue imaging.

Authors:  N R Grubb; A Fleming; G R Sutherland; K A Fox
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The AutoQual ultrasound elastography method for quantitative assessment of lateral strain in post-rupture Achilles tendons.

Authors:  Phillip G Brown; Joseph Alsousou; Ashley Cooper; Mark S Thompson; J Alison Noble
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Changes in lower extremity biomechanics due to a short-term fatigue protocol.

Authors:  Nelson Cortes; Eric Greska; Roger Kollock; Jatin Ambegaonkar; James A Onate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Office-based elastographic technique for quantifying mechanical properties of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Ballyns; Diego Turo; Paul Otto; Jay P Shah; Jennifer Hammond; Tadesse Gebreab; Lynn H Gerber; Siddhartha Sikdar
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.153
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Does Muscle-Tendon Unit Structure Predispose to Hamstring Strain Injury During Running? A Critical Review.

Authors:  Shaun Huygaerts; Francesc Cos; Daniel D Cohen; Julio Calleja-González; Ricard Pruna; Pedro E Alcaraz; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Image acquisition stability of fixated musculoskeletal sonography in an exercise setting: a quantitative analysis and comparison with freehand acquisition.

Authors:  H Maarten Heres; Marloes Sjoerdsma; Thijs Schoots; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse; Richard G P Lopata
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  A systematic review of in vivo stretching regimens on inflammation and its relevance to translational yoga research.

Authors:  Dennis Muñoz-Vergara; Weronika Grabowska; Gloria Y Yeh; Sat Bir Khalsa; Kristin L Schreiber; Christene A Huang; Ann Marie Zavacki; Peter M Wayne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Ultrasonic assessment of exercise-induced change in skeletal muscle glycogen content.

Authors:  David C Nieman; R Andrew Shanely; Kevin A Zwetsloot; Mary Pat Meaney; Gerald E Farris
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-18

Review 5.  State-of-the-Art Methods for Skeletal Muscle Glycogen Analysis in Athletes-The Need for Novel Non-Invasive Techniques.

Authors:  Jacob Greene; Julien Louis; Olga Korostynska; Alex Mason
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-23

6.  Curated Model Development Using NEUROiD: A Web-Based NEUROmotor Integration and Design Platform.

Authors:  Raghu Sesha Iyengar; Madhav Vinodh Pithapuram; Avinash Kumar Singh; Mohan Raghavan
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Lisa Mohr; Lutz Vogt; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30

8.  Assessment of lower limb peripheral nerves with ultrasound in patients with traumatic amputation.

Authors:  İlkay Karabay; Yasin Demir; Özlem Köroğlu; Sefa Gümrük Aslan; Koray Aydemir; Eda Gürçay
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-01

9.  Pressure based MRI-compatible muscle fascicle length and joint angle estimation.

Authors:  Hyungeun Song; Erica Israel; Shriya Srinivasan; Hugh Herr
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.262
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.