Literature DB >> 31701347

Image acquisition stability of fixated musculoskeletal sonography in an exercise setting: a quantitative analysis and comparison with freehand acquisition.

H Maarten Heres1, Marloes Sjoerdsma2, Thijs Schoots3, Marcel C M Rutten2, Frans N van de Vosse2, Richard G P Lopata2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In dynamic musculoskeletal sonography, probe fixation can contribute to field of view (FOV) consistency, which is necessary for valid analysis of architectural parameters. In this volunteer study, the achieved FOV consistency in fixated ultrasonography was quantified and compared with freehand acquisition.
METHODS: During five resting periods during cycling exercise, longitudinal B-mode images of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle were acquired on one thigh with a fixated probe, and by two trained observers on the other thigh. In each acquisition, the structural similarity compared to the first resting period was determined using the complex wavelet structural similarity index (CW-SSIM). Also, the pennation angle of the VL was measured. Both CW-SSIM and pennation angle were compared between fixated and freehand acquisition. Furthermore, the compression of tissue by the probe fixation was measured.
RESULTS: In fixated acquisition, a significantly higher structural similarity (p < 0.05) and an improved repeatability of pennation angle measurement were obtained compared to freehand acquisition. Probe fixation compressed muscle tissue by 12% on average.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of the structural similarity showed an increase in FOV consistency with sonography compared to freehand acquisition. The demonstrated feasibility of long-term fixated acquisition might be attractive in many medical fields and sports, and for reduction of work-related ergonomic problems among sonographers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image quality; Musculoskeletal sonography; Probe fixation; Structural similarity; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31701347     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-019-00983-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  27 in total

1.  Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P W Hodges; L H M Pengel; R D Herbert; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Active patellar tracking measurement: a novel device using ultrasound.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Shih; Anthony M J Bull; Alison H McGregor; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Usefulness of a novel ultrasound transducer for continuous monitoring treadmill exercise echocardiography to assess coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakashiki; Akira Kisanuki; Yutaka Otsuji; Shiro Yoshifuku; Toshinori Yuasa; Kunitsugu Takasaki; Eiji Kuwahara; Bo Yu; Takeshi Uemura; Naoko Mizukami; Shuichi Hamasaki; Shinichi Minagoe; Chuwa Tei
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.993

4.  Complex wavelet structural similarity: a new image similarity index.

Authors:  Mehul P Sampat; Zhou Wang; Shalini Gupta; Alan Conrad Bovik; Mia K Markey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Power Doppler sonography: use in measuring alterations in muscle blood volume after exercise.

Authors:  J S Newman; R S Adler; J M Rubin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications.

Authors:  E E Drakonaki; G M Allen; D J Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images.

Authors:  Gabriel Prieto Renieblas; Agustín Turrero Nogués; Alberto Muñoz González; Nieves Gómez-Leon; Eduardo Guibelalde Del Castillo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-26

8.  Supine bicycle stress echocardiography: peak exercise imaging is superior to postexercise imaging.

Authors:  H S Hecht; L DeBord; N Sotomayor; R Shaw; R Dunlap; C Ryan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter.

Authors:  Satoshi Muraki; Kiyotaka Fukumoto; Osamu Fukuda
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-12

10.  A novel application of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Avinash Eranki; Nelson Cortes; Zrinka Gregurić Ferenček; Siddhartha Sikdar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.