PURPOSE: To investigate the permittivity and conductivity of cancerous and normal tissues, their correlation to the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the specificity that they could add to cancer detection. THEORY: Breast and prostate carcinomas were induced in rats. Conductivity and permittivity measurements were performed in the anesthetized animals using a dielectric probe and an impedance analyzer between 50 and 270 MHz. The correlations between ADCs (measured at 128 MHz) and conductivity values were investigated. Frequency-dependent discriminant functions were computed to assess the value that each parameter adds to cancer detection. METHODS: Tumors exhibited higher permittivity than muscle tissue by 27%/12%/5% at 64/128/270MHz. Frequency independent, 15-20% higher conductivity was also noted in tumors compared to muscle tissue over the same frequency range. Strong negative correlation was observed between tissue conductivity and ADC. Whereas permittivity had the strongest discriminatory power at 64 MHz, it became comparable to ADC at 128 MHz and less important than ADC at 270 MHz. CONCLUSION: Conductivity measurements offered limited advantages in separating cancer from normal tissue beyond what ADC already provided; conversely, permittivity added separation power when added to the discriminant function. The moderately high cancerous tissue permittivity and conductivity impose strong constraints on the capability of MRI-based tissue electrical property measurements.
PURPOSE: To investigate the permittivity and conductivity of cancerous and normal tissues, their correlation to the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the specificity that they could add to cancer detection. THEORY: Breast and prostate carcinomas were induced in rats. Conductivity and permittivity measurements were performed in the anesthetized animals using a dielectric probe and an impedance analyzer between 50 and 270 MHz. The correlations between ADCs (measured at 128 MHz) and conductivity values were investigated. Frequency-dependent discriminant functions were computed to assess the value that each parameter adds to cancer detection. METHODS:Tumors exhibited higher permittivity than muscle tissue by 27%/12%/5% at 64/128/270MHz. Frequency independent, 15-20% higher conductivity was also noted in tumors compared to muscle tissue over the same frequency range. Strong negative correlation was observed between tissue conductivity and ADC. Whereas permittivity had the strongest discriminatory power at 64 MHz, it became comparable to ADC at 128 MHz and less important than ADC at 270 MHz. CONCLUSION: Conductivity measurements offered limited advantages in separating cancer from normal tissue beyond what ADC already provided; conversely, permittivity added separation power when added to the discriminant function. The moderately high cancerous tissue permittivity and conductivity impose strong constraints on the capability of MRI-based tissue electrical property measurements.
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B DeMartini; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Steven W White; Constance D Lehman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Mariya Lazebnik; Dijana Popovic; Leah McCartney; Cynthia B Watkins; Mary J Lindstrom; Josephine Harter; Sarah Sewall; Travis Ogilvie; Anthony Magliocco; Tara M Breslin; Walley Temple; Daphne Mew; John H Booske; Michal Okoniewski; Susan C Hagness Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Astrid L H M W van Lier; Alexander Raaijmakers; Tobias Voigt; Jan J W Lagendijk; Peter R Luijten; Ulrich Katscher; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Shannon Helsper; F Andrew Bagdasarian; Jens T Rosenberg; Samuel C Grant Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jiaen Liu; Qi Shao; Yicun Wang; Gregor Adriany; John Bischof; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Bin He Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.668