Literature DB >> 29511804

Correlation between electrical conductivity and apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer: effect of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging.

Soo-Yeon Kim1,2, Jaewook Shin3, Dong-Hyun Kim3, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Hee Jung Moon1, Jung Hyun Yoon1, Jai Kyung You4, Min Jung Kim5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between conductivity and ADC in invasive ductal carcinoma according to the presence of necrosis on MRI.
METHODS: Eighty-one women with invasive ductal carcinoma ≥1 cm on T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence of preoperative MRI were included. Phase-based MR electric properties tomography was used to reconstruct conductivity. Mean ADC was measured. Necrosis was defined as an area with very high T2 signal intensity. The relationship between conductivity and ADC was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with conductivity or ADC.
RESULTS: In the total group, conductivity showed negative correlation with ADC (r = -0.357, p = 0.001). This correlation was maintained in the subgroup without necrosis (n = 53, r = -0.455, p = 0.001), but not in the subgroup with necrosis (n = 28, r = -0.080, p = 0.687). The correlation between the two parameters was different according to necrosis (r = -0.455 vs -0.080, p = 0.047). HER2 enriched subtype was independently associated with conductivity (p = 0.029). Necrosis on MRI was independently associated with ADC (p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Conductivity shows negative correlation with ADC that is abolished by the presence of necrosis on MRI. KEY POINTS: • Electric conductivity showed negative correlation with ADC • However, the correlation was abolished by the presence of necrosis on MRI • HER2-enriched subtype was independently associated with conductivity • Necrosis on MRI was independently associated with ADC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Breast cancer; Diagnostic imaging; Electric conductivity; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511804     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5291-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  MR-based conductivity imaging using multiple receiver coils.

Authors:  Joonsung Lee; Jaewook Shin; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.

Authors:  Sonya D Edwards; Jafi A Lipson; Debra M Ikeda; Janie M Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Reiko Woodhams; Saadallah Ramadan; Peter Stanwell; Satoko Sakamoto; Hirofumi Hata; Masanori Ozaki; Shinichi Kan; Yusuke Inoue
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential surrogate marker for Ki-67 index in mucinous breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Natsuko Onishi; Shotaro Kanao; Masako Kataoka; Mami Iima; Rena Sakaguchi; Makiko Kawai; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Yoshiki Mikami; Masakazu Toi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-Mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Fan Yang; Matthias Dietzel; Aimée Herzog; Anke Simon; Tibor Vag; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner Alois Kaiser
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Initial study on in vivo conductivity mapping of breast cancer using MRI.

Authors:  Jaewook Shin; Min Jung Kim; Joonsung Lee; Yoonho Nam; Min-Oh Kim; Narae Choi; Sooyeon Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yong Guo; You-Quan Cai; Zu-Long Cai; Yuan-Gui Gao; Ning-Yu An; Lin Ma; Srikanth Mahankali; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  On conductivity, permittivity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and their usefulness as cancer markers at MRI frequencies.

Authors:  Ileana Hancu; Jeannette Christine Roberts; Selaka Bulumulla; Seung-Kyun Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Sachiko Yuen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

1.  Automated gradient-based electrical properties tomography in the human brain using 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Bin He
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Diagnostic value of electric properties tomography (EPT) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: comparison with standard dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Keiko Tsuchiya; Deepa Sheth; Shunji Mugikura; Kei Takase; Ulrich Katscher; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.

Authors:  Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Shannon Helsper; F Andrew Bagdasarian; Jens T Rosenberg; Samuel C Grant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Transceive phase corrected 2D contrast source inversion-electrical properties tomography.

Authors:  Peter R S Stijnman; Patrick S Fuchs; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Rob F Remis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Toshiki Kazama; Taro Takahara; Jun Hashimoto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.