Literature DB >> 24944489

Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital.

Shigeo Koido1, Toshifumi Ohkusa1, Kosaburo Nakae1, Tetsuji Yokoyama1, Tomoyoshi Shibuya1, Naoto Sakamoto1, Kan Uchiyama1, Hiroshi Arakawa1, Taro Osada1, Akihito Nagahara1, Sumio Watanabe1, Hisao Tajiri1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital.
METHODS: A total of 11812 consecutive Japanese people were identified who underwent a colonoscopy at an academic hospital. A multiple logistic regression model was used to evaluate retrospectively the significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy.
RESULTS: The cecal intubation rate was 95.0%. By univariate analysis, age, female sex, poor bowel cleansing, and a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery were significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy (P < 0.001). Moreover, age- and sex-adjusted analysis showed that significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy were female sex (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.17-1.64, P = 0.0002), age ≥ 60 years old (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.22-1.71, P < 0.0001), a history of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery (OR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.28-1.86, P < 0.0001), poor bowel cleansing (OR = 4.64, 95%CI: 3.69-5.84, P < 0.0001), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.13-1.95, P = 0.0048). In Japanese men, by age-adjusted analysis, IBD (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.18-2.43, P = 0.005) was an independent risk factor for incomplete colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Several characteristics in the Japanese population were identified that could predict technical difficulty with colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Incomplete; Inflammatory bowel disease; Intubation rates; Japanese academic hospital; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24944489      PMCID: PMC4051938          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Completion rate to caecum as a quality measure of colonoscopy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  D A Gorard; A S McIntyre
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Hideyasu Fujii; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.

Authors:  J C Anderson; J D Gonzalez; C R Messina; B J Pollack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W H Kim; Y J Cho; J Y Park; P K Min; J K Kang; I S Park
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C R Messina; W Cohn; E Gottfried; S Ingber; G Bernstein; E Coman; J Polito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Limited-preparation CT colonography in frail elderly patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Aoife N Keeling; Michael M Slattery; Sum Leong; Eoghan McCarthy; Maja Susanto; Michael J Lee; Martina M Morrin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up.

Authors:  M Neerincx; J S Terhaar sive Droste; C J Mulder; M Räkers; J F Bartelsman; R J Loffeld; H A Tuynman; R M Brohet; R W van der Hulst
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: a continual search for excellence.

Authors:  Matthew L Bechtold; Abhishek Choudhary
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease: what is the role of colonoscopy?

Authors:  Sung-Ae Jung
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-08-22
View more
  18 in total

1.  Double-Balloon Colonoscopy Has a Higher Cecal Intubation Rate Than Conventional Colonoscopy Using a Colon Simulator.

Authors:  Keijiro Sunada; Satoshi Shinozaki; Tomonori Yano; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Hirotsugu Sakamoto; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  When Experts Fail: Use of a Short Turning Radius Colonoscope Facilitates Successful Completion of Colonoscopy in Patients with Bowel Fixity.

Authors:  Mohit Girotra; Saurabh Sethi; Monique T Barakat; Robert J Huang; Shai Friedland; Uri Ladabaum; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  When and why a colonoscopist should discontinue colonoscopy by himself?

Authors:  Tao Gan; Jin-Lin Yang; Jun-Chao Wu; Yi-Ping Wang; Li Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Gyu Man Oh; Kyoungwon Jung; Sung Eun Kim; Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Piero Boraschi; Francescamaria Donati
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Aradhna Kaushal; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Richard D Neal; Bernard Rachet; Greg Rubin; Hardeep Singh; Fiona M Walter; Niek J de Wit; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Double-Balloon Endoscopy after Incomplete Colonoscopy and Its Comparison with Computed Tomography Colonography.

Authors:  Carlijn Hermans; Dennis van der Zee; Lennard Gilissen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-01-10

8.  Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time.

Authors:  Adegboyega Akere; Jesse Abiodun Otegbayo
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07

9.  Impact of Intestinal Ultrasound on Classification and Management of Crohn's Disease Patients with Inconclusive Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rune Wilkens; Kerri L Novak; Eleonore Lebeuf-Taylor; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-19

10.  Occult Spigelian Hernia Presenting as Inability to Complete Colon Cancer Screening in a Patient with a History of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Persinger; Marc D Basson
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.