Literature DB >> 26167083

When and why a colonoscopist should discontinue colonoscopy by himself?

Tao Gan1, Jin-Lin Yang1, Jun-Chao Wu1, Yi-Ping Wang1, Li Yang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate when and why a colonoscopist should discontinue incomplete colonoscopy by himself.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 517 difficult colonoscope insertions (Grade C, Kudo's difficulty classification) screened from 37800 colonoscopy insertions were collected from April 2004 to June 2014 by three 4(th)-level (Kudo's classification) colonoscopists. The following common factors for the incomplete insertion were excluded: structural obstruction of the colon or rectum, insufficient colon cleansing, discontinuation due to patient's discomfort or pain, severe colon disease with a perforation risk (e.g., severe ischemic colonopathy). All the excluded patients were re-scheduled if permission was obtained from the patients whose intubation had failed. If the repeat intubations were still a failure because of the difficult operative techniques, those patients were also included in this study. The patient's age, sex, anesthesia and colonoscope type were recorded before colonoscopy. During the colonoscopic examination, the influencing factors of fixation, tortuosity, laxity and redundancy of the colon were assessed, and the insertion time (> 10 min or ≤ 10 min) were registered. The insertion time was analyzed by t-test, and other factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two (62.3%) of the 517 insertions were complete in the colonoscope insertion into the ileocecum, but 195 (37.7%) failed in the insertion. Fixation, tortuosity, laxity or redundancy occurred during the colonoscopic examination. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that fixation (OR = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.03-0.16, P < 0.001) and tortuosity (OR = 0.04, 95%CI: 0.02-0.08, P < 0.001) were significantly related to the insertion into the ileocecum in the left hemicolon; multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that fixation (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.06-0.39, P < 0.001), tortuosity (OR 0.23, 95%CI: 0.13-0.43, P < 0.001), redundancy (OR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.26, P < 0.001) and sex (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.20-0.63, P < 0.001) were significantly related to the insertion into the ileocecum in the right hemicolon. Prolonged insertion time (> 10 min) was an unfavorable factor for the insertion into the ileocecum.
CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy should be discontinued if freedom of the colonoscope body's insertion and rotation is completely lost, and the insertion time is prolonged over 30 min.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscope insertion; Colonoscopy; Insertion technique

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26167083      PMCID: PMC4491970          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M O Othman; A G Bradley; A Choudhary; R M Hoffman; P K Roy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy after incomplete colonoscopy in the redundant colon.

Authors:  Drew B Schembre; Andrew S Ross; Michael N Gluck; John J Brandabur; Susan E McCormick; Otto S Lin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W H Kim; Y J Cho; J Y Park; P K Min; J K Kang; I S Park
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Rates of complete colonic evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy and their associated factors: a population-based study.

Authors:  Randy Rizek; Lawrence F Paszat; Therese A Stukel; Refik Saskin; Cindy Li; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Wireless capsule endoscopy of the large intestine: a review with future projections.

Authors:  Andre Van Gossum
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.287

6.  Colon capsule endoscopy is feasible to perform after incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup in clinical practice.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Nikos Viazis; Panagiotis Tsibouris; Georgios Zacharakis; Chryssostomos Kalantzis; Demetrios G Karamanolis; Spiros D Ladas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Effect of propofol anesthesia on force application during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Nadim G Haddad; David C Metz; Lawrence J Brandt; Stanley B Benjamin; Susan K Lazerow; Hannah L Miller; Mihriye Mete; Milind Patel; Vladimir Egorov
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Randomised controlled trial of paediatric magnetic positioning device assisted colonoscopy: a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  J P Franciosi; M Mascarenhas; E Semeao; J Flick; J Kelly; P Mamula
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  The prone 12 o'clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position.

Authors:  Arjuna P De Silva; Ravindu S Kumarasena; Suramya D Perera Keragala; Udaya Kalubowila; Madunil Niriella; Anuradha S Dassanayake; Arunasalam Pathmeswaran; H Janaka de Silva
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope.

Authors:  Qin Xie; Bin Chen; Liu Liu; Huatian Gan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Xu; Xiao-Liang Zhao; Gui-Ping Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The correlation between diverticulosis and redundant colon.

Authors:  Tahleesa Cuda; Ronny Gunnarsson; Alan de Costa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.