Literature DB >> 24942180

Intentions to donate to a biobank in a national sample of African Americans.

Jasmine A McDonald1, Susan Vadaparampil, Deborah Bowen, Gayenell Magwood, Jihad S Obeid, Melanie Jefferson, Richard Drake, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Chanita Hughes Halbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite the investments being made to develop biobanks, African Americans are under-represented in genomic studies. We identified factors having significant independent associations with intentions to donate personal health information and blood and/or tissue samples to a biobank in a national random sample of African Americans (n = 1,033).
METHODS: We conducted a national survey from October 2010 through February 2011.
RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of respondents reported that it was not at all likely that they would donate to a biobank, 18% reported it was a little likely, 36% reported it was somewhat likely, and 23% reported it was very likely. Respondents who were likely to donate to a biobank had greater positive expectations about participating in cancer genetics research and reported more participation facilitators relative to barriers. Respondents who were distrustful of researchers had a significantly lower likelihood of being willing to donate to a biobank compared to those who were less distrustful.
CONCLUSIONS: African Americans have diverse attitudes about participating in genetics research, and many are likely to donate to a biobank based on expectations of positive outcomes. It may be important to address attitudes about genetics research as part of recruitment to enhance the quality of informed consent for participation in biobanks among African Americans.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942180      PMCID: PMC5019027          DOI: 10.1159/000360472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  24 in total

1.  Genebanks: a comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases.

Authors:  Melissa A Austin; Sarah Harding; Courtney McElroy
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Susan K Peterson; Amelie Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Paige Green McDonald; Celette Sugg Skinner; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  Matthew D Mailman; Michael Feolo; Yumi Jin; Masato Kimura; Kimberly Tryka; Rinat Bagoutdinov; Luning Hao; Anne Kiang; Justin Paschall; Lon Phan; Natalia Popova; Stephanie Pretel; Lora Ziyabari; Moira Lee; Yu Shao; Zhen Y Wang; Karl Sirotkin; Minghong Ward; Michael Kholodov; Kerry Zbicz; Jeffrey Beck; Michael Kimelman; Sergey Shevelev; Don Preuss; Eugene Yaschenko; Alan Graeff; James Ostell; Stephen T Sherry
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The value of banked samples for oncology drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Peter M Shaw; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

5.  Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk.

Authors:  C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; J Benkendorf; J Kerner; C Isaacs; J Barter; C Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

6.  Understanding participation by African Americans in cancer genetics research.

Authors:  Jasmine A McDonald; Frances K Barg; Benita Weathers; Carmen E Guerra; Andrea B Troxel; Susan Domchek; Deborah Bowen; Judy A Shea; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The Cancer Genetics Network: recruitment results and pilot studies.

Authors:  Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Deborah Bowen; Dianne Finkelstein; Constance Griffin; James Hanson; Claudine Isaacs; Carol Kasten-Sportes; Geraldine Mineau; Prakash Nadkarni; Barbara Rimer; Joellen Schildkraut; Louise Strong; Barbara Weber; Deborah Winn; Robert Hiatt; Susan Nayfield
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2003

9.  Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.

Authors:  Colin M E Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Kathryn S Porter; Maria Agelli; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  20 in total

1.  Perspective: A Call for Precision in Faith-based Initiatives Promoting Health among African Americans.

Authors:  Marino A Bruce; Keith C Norris; Bettina M Beech; Janice V Bowie; Roland J Thorpe
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria Cain; Lori H Erby; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; Eva Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque; Denise M Scott
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-14

3.  Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Nalo Hamilton; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-06-16

4.  Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Multiple Sclerosis Research Among Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Daniela A Pimentel Maldonado; April Moreno; Mitzi J Williams; Lilyana Amezcua; Shawn Feliciano; Anita Williams; Daniel Machemer; Terrie Livingston; Monique LaRocque; Melissa Glim; Hollie Schmidt
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Factors Influencing Participation in Biospecimen Research among Parents of Youth with Mental Health Conditions.

Authors:  Ashli A Owen-Smith; Musu M Sesay; Frances L Lynch; Maria Massolo; Hilda Cerros; Lisa A Croen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.

Authors:  Katherine M Brown; Bettina F Drake; Sarah Gehlert; Leslie E Wolf; James DuBois; Joann Seo; Krista Woodward; Hannah Perkins; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-08-25

7.  Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review.

Authors:  Juan R Canedo; Stephania T Miller; Hector F Myers; Maureen Sanderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Angelina Olesen; Zurina Mahadi; Maznah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Opportunities to Improve Women's Health: Engaging Racial/Ethnic Diverse Women to Provide Biospecimens for Research.

Authors:  Megan C Edmonds; Arnethea L Sutton; Yvonne Cummings; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  ChicagO Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS): Increased Response Rates Among African American Residents in Low Socioeconomic Status Neighborhoods.

Authors:  David J Press; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Diane Lauderdale; Elizabeth Stepniak; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Emily Peterson Johnson; Rajan Gopalakrishnan; Fabrice Smieliauskas; Donald Hedeker; Luís Bettencourt; Luc Anselin; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.