Literature DB >> 23092046

Understanding participation by African Americans in cancer genetics research.

Jasmine A McDonald1, Frances K Barg, Benita Weathers, Carmen E Guerra, Andrea B Troxel, Susan Domchek, Deborah Bowen, Judy A Shea, Chanita Hughes Halbert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Understanding genetic factors that contribute to racial differences in cancer outcomes may reduce racial disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality. Achieving this goal will be limited by low rates of African American participation in cancer genetics research.
METHOD: We conducted a qualitative study with African American adults (n = 91) to understand attitudes about participating in cancer genetics research and to identify factors that are considered when making a decision about participating in this type of research.
RESULTS: Participants would consider the potential benefits to themselves, family members, and their community when making a decision to participate in cancer genetics research. However, concerns about exploitation, distrust of researchers, and investigators' motives were also important to participation decisions. Individuals would also consider who has access to their personal information and what would happen to these data. Side effects, logistical issues, and the potential to gain knowledge about health issues were also described as important factors in decision making.
CONCLUSION: African Americans may consider a number of ethical, legal, and social issues when making a decision to participate in cancer genetics research. These issues should be addressed as part of recruitment efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23092046      PMCID: PMC3760677          DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30172-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  36 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Susan K Peterson; Amelie Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Paige Green McDonald; Celette Sugg Skinner; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Recruiting African American women to participate in hereditary breast cancer research.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Kiyona Brewster; Aliya Collier; Chachira Smith; Lisa Kessler; Benita Weathers; Jill E Stopfer; Susan Domchek; E Paul Wileyto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Inherited genotype and prostate cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?

Authors:  Tineke M Meulenkamp; Sjef K Gevers; Jasper A Bovenberg; Gerard H Koppelman; Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Asking the right questions: views on genetic variation research among black and white research participants.

Authors:  Jada Bussey-Jones; Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Mairead Moloney; Connie Blumenthal; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Lack of comprehension of common prostate cancer terms in an underserved population.

Authors:  Kerry L Kilbridge; Gertrude Fraser; Murray Krahn; Elizabeth M Nelson; Mark Conaway; Randall Bashore; Andrew Wolf; Michael J Barry; Debra A Gong; Robert F Nease; Alfred F Connors
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies.

Authors:  Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Jada Bussey-Jones; Mairead Eastin Moloney; Connie Blumenthal; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  20 in total

1.  Multiple Comorbidities and Interest in Research Participation Among Clients of a Nonprofit Food Distribution Site.

Authors:  Robin T Higashi; Simon J Craddock Lee; Tammy Leonard; Erica L Cuate; Jay Cole; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Increase or Predict the Success Rate of Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Patients With Azoospermia?

Authors:  Heng Xue; Shou-Yang Wang; Li-Gang Cui; Kai Hong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Intervention completion rates among African Americans in a randomized effectiveness trial for diet and physical activity changes.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Scarlett Bellamy; Vanessa Briggs; Marjorie Bowman; Ernestine Delmoor; Jerry C Johnson; Shiriki Kumanyika; Cathy Melvin; Joseph Purnell; Rodney Rogers; Benita Weathers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Promoting public awareness and engagement in genome sciences.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Katie D Rosanbalm; Larry Boles; Genevieve M Tindall; Troy M Livingston; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria Cain; Lori H Erby; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; Eva Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque; Denise M Scott
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  Recruiting for diversity: a pilot test of recruitment strategies for a national alcohol survey with mail-in genetic data collection.

Authors:  Karen G Chartier; Priscilla Martinez; Cory Cummings; Brien P Riley; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Challenges in efficacy research: the case of feeding alternatives in patients with dementia.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Elaine Amella; Gayenell Magwood; Mohan Madisetti; Donald Garrow; Melissa Batchelor-Aselage
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.

Authors:  Aaron G Buseh; Patricia E Stevens; Sandra Millon-Underwood; Leolia Townsend; Sheryl T Kelber
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-06-29

10.  Intentions to donate to a biobank in a national sample of African Americans.

Authors:  Jasmine A McDonald; Susan Vadaparampil; Deborah Bowen; Gayenell Magwood; Jihad S Obeid; Melanie Jefferson; Richard Drake; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.