Literature DB >> 24940457

Are stone analysis results different with repeated sampling?

Terence T N Lee1, Mohamed A Elkoushy1, Sero Andonian1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We assessed differences in results of stone analyses on subsequent sampling.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with stone analyses at a tertiary stone centre between March 2006 and July 2012 was performed. All stones were analyzed at a centralized laboratory using infrared spectroscopy. Patients were grouped according to the first predominant stone type on record, as defined by the predominant stone component of at least 60%. Stone groups included calcium oxalate (CaOx), calcium phosphate (CaP), uric acid (UA), cystine, struvite, mixed CaOx-CaP and mixed CaOx-UA. All patients had a full metabolic stone workup.
RESULTS: Of the 303 patients with stone analyses, 118 (38.9%) patients had multiple stone analyses. The mean age was 53.4 ± 15.1 years, and 87 (73.7%) were males. Of the 118, the initial stone analysis showed 43 CaOx, 38 CaP, 21 UA, 4 CaOx-CaP, 2 CaOx-UA, 6 cystine, and 4 struvite. There was a different stone composition in 25 (21.2%) patients with a median time delay of 64.5 days. Different compositions were found in 7 CaOx (to 3 CaP, 2 CaOx-CaP, and 2 UA), 5 CaP (to 3 CaOx and 2 CaOx-CaP), 3 UA (to 3 CaOx), 4 CaOx-CaP (to 2CaOx, 1 UA and 1 CaP), 2 CaOx-UA (to 2 CaOx) and 4 struvite (to 3 CaP and 1 UA).
CONCLUSIONS: Stone composition was different in 21.2% of patients on subsequent analyses.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940457      PMCID: PMC4039594          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  18 in total

1.  Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes.

Authors:  Neil Mandel; Ian Mandel; Kathy Fryjoff; Tammy Rejniak; Gretchen Mandel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  F L Coe; J H Parks; J R Asplin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient.

Authors:  Ryan Paterson; Alfonso Fernandez; Hassan Razvi; Roger Sutton
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  The first kidney stone.

Authors:  J Uribarri; M S Oh; H J Carroll
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Changing composition of renal calculi in patients with musculoskeletal anomalies.

Authors:  Ehud Gnessin; Jessica A Mandeville; Shelly E Handa; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Changing composition of staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Davis P Viprakasit; Mark D Sawyer; S Duke Herrell; Nicole L Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The composition and quantitative analysis of urinary calculi in patients with renal calculi.

Authors:  S Jawalekar; V T Surve; A K Bhutey
Journal:  Nepal Med Coll J       Date:  2010-09

9.  Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Geoffrey Joyce; Anga R Timilsina
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  The financial effects of kidney stone prevention.

Authors:  J H Parks; F L Coe
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  7 in total

1.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  CUA guideline on the evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient - 2016 update.

Authors:  Marie Dion; Ghada Ankawi; Ben Chew; Ryan Paterson; Nabil Sultan; Patti Hoddinott; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  UPDATE - Canadian Urological Association guideline: Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Brendan Wallace; Linda Lee; Kamaljot S Kaler; Marie Dion; Andrea Cowan; Nabil Sultan; Ben H Chew; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

4.  Predictors of success following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort.

Authors:  Mohit Bajaj; Russell Smith; Michael Rice; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-07-14

5.  Stone Composition Among First-Time Symptomatic Kidney Stone Formers in the Community.

Authors:  Prince Singh; Felicity T Enders; Lisa E Vaughan; Eric J Bergstralh; John J Knoedler; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Kidney stone analysis: "Give me your stone, I will tell you who you are!".

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer; Michel Daudon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Luke F Reynolds; Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.