Literature DB >> 16164658

Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?

Christopher S Saigal1, Geoffrey Joyce, Anga R Timilsina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance.
METHODS: This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, non-elderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics.
RESULTS: More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were 3,494 US dollars per person in 2000.
CONCLUSION: The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16164658     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  113 in total

1.  Motion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom study.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Joseph G Cernigliaro; Robert A Pooley; James C Williams; William E Haley
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

2.  Urolithiasis in a rural Wisconsin population from 1992 to 2008: narrowing of the male-to-female ratio.

Authors:  Kristina L Penniston; Ian D McLaren; Robert T Greenlee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  [Economic aspects of evidence-based metaphylaxis].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States.

Authors:  Tom H Brikowski; Yair Lotan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Is there a better way to work-up kidney stones?

Authors:  Kenneth Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Trevor A McGrath; Robert A Frank; Nicola Schieda; Brian Blew; Jean-Paul Salameh; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Elaine M Worcester; Fredric L Coe
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.907

8.  Preclinical Testing of a Combination Stone Basket and Ureteral Balloon to Extract Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Rustin Massoudi; Thomas J Metzner; Buzz Bonneau; Tin C Ngo; Rajesh Shinghal; John T Leppert
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  The exposome for kidney stones.

Authors:  David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.