Literature DB >> 8914040

The financial effects of kidney stone prevention.

J H Parks1, F L Coe.   

Abstract

Prevention of nephrolithiasis (NL) is now medically feasible and widely recommended. However, diagnosis and treatment of remediable causes of stones requires testing and drugs that impose a cost; this cost is balanced by the presumed reductions in stone related events and medical encounters. In order to assess the balance between these, we have analyzed results from 1092 patients with NL unselected except for having clinical follow-up during treatment. From this population, we have derived the changes in rates of new stones, hospitalizations, cystoscopies, and surgical procedures. From these changes, and assignment of a range of possible dollar costs, we estimate that medical stone prevention will result in an average saving of $2,158 +/- $500 (SEM)/patient/year, which is the difference between an expenditure of $1,068/patient on yearly drugs and testing, and a reduction of $3,226 per patient in medical costs. Medical prevention of NL seems justified on a cost saving basis quite apart from its benefits to patients in terms of reduced morbidity and risk from procedures, obstruction, and infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914040     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1996.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  21 in total

1.  Arguments for a comprehensive metabolic evaluation of the first-time stone former.

Authors:  Ryan F Paterson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The potential of at-home prediction of the formation of urolithiasis by simple multi-frequency electrical conductivity of the urine and the comparison of its performance with urine ion-related indices, color and specific gravity.

Authors:  Angelito A Silverio; Wen-Yaw Chung; Cheanyeh Cheng; Hai-Lung Wang; Chien-Min Kung; Jun Chen; Vincent F S Tsai
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Changes in stone composition over two decades: evaluation of over 10,000 stone analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Moses; Vernon M Pais; Michal Ursiny; Edwin L Prien; Nicole Miller; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  International comparison of cost effectiveness of medical management strategies for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-28

5.  Metabolic evaluation guidelines in patients with nephrolithiasis: Are they being followed? Results of a national, multi-institutional, quality-assessment study.

Authors:  Sabrina S Harmouch; Hiba Abou-Haidar; Hassan Elhawary; Thomas Grgic; Andrea G Lantz; Jason Y Lee; Ben H Chew; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Clinical review. Kidney stones 2012: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Khashayar Sakhaee; Naim M Maalouf; Bridget Sinnott
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Is prevention of stone recurrence financially worthwhile?

Authors:  W G Robertson
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-03

8.  Epidemiological trends in urolithiasis: impact on our health care systems.

Authors:  Alberto Trinchieri
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-01-27

Review 9.  Insights on the pathology of kidney stone formation.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Fredric L Coe; James E Lingeman; Elaine Worcester
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-08-03

10.  Are stone analysis results different with repeated sampling?

Authors:  Terence T N Lee; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.