Literature DB >> 24937093

Deformable image registration with local rigidity constraints for cone-beam CT-guided spine surgery.

S Reaungamornrat1, A S Wang, A Uneri, Y Otake, A J Khanna, J H Siewerdsen.   

Abstract

Image-guided spine surgery (IGSS) is associated with reduced co-morbidity and improved surgical outcome. However, precise localization of target anatomy and adjacent nerves and vessels relative to planning information (e.g., device trajectories) can be challenged by anatomical deformation. Rigid registration alone fails to account for deformation associated with changes in spine curvature, and conventional deformable registration fails to account for rigidity of the vertebrae, causing unrealistic distortions in the registered image that can confound high-precision surgery. We developed and evaluated a deformable registration method capable of preserving rigidity of bones while resolving the deformation of surrounding soft tissue. The method aligns preoperative CT to intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) using free-form deformation (FFD) with constraints on rigid body motion imposed according to a simple intensity threshold of bone intensities. The constraints enforced three properties of a rigid transformation-namely, constraints on affinity (AC), orthogonality (OC), and properness (PC). The method also incorporated an injectivity constraint (IC) to preserve topology. Physical experiments involving phantoms, an ovine spine, and a human cadaver as well as digital simulations were performed to evaluate the sensitivity to registration parameters, preservation of rigid body morphology, and overall registration accuracy of constrained FFD in comparison to conventional unconstrained FFD (uFFD) and Demons registration. FFD with orthogonality and injectivity constraints (denoted FFD+OC+IC) demonstrated improved performance compared to uFFD and Demons. Affinity and properness constraints offered little or no additional improvement. The FFD+OC+IC method preserved rigid body morphology at near-ideal values of zero dilatation (D = 0.05, compared to 0.39 and 0.56 for uFFD and Demons, respectively) and shear (S = 0.08, compared to 0.36 and 0.44 for uFFD and Demons, respectively). Target registration error (TRE) was similarly improved for FFD+OC+IC (0.7 mm), compared to 1.4 and 1.8 mm for uFFD and Demons. Results were validated in human cadaver studies using CT and CBCT images, with FFD+OC+IC providing excellent preservation of rigid morphology and equivalent or improved TRE. The approach therefore overcomes distortions intrinsic to uFFD and could better facilitate high-precision IGSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24937093      PMCID: PMC4118832          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  45 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of osseous lesion of the spine in patients with known or suspected malignancy.

Authors:  Eric Lis; Mark H Bilsky; Leszek Pisinski; Patrick Boland; John H Healey; Bernie O'malley; George Krol
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Xavier Pennec; Aymeric Perchant; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Deformable image registration for cone-beam CT guided transoral robotic base-of-tongue surgery.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; W P Liu; A S Wang; Y Otake; S Nithiananthan; A Uneri; S Schafer; E Tryggestad; J Richmon; J M Sorger; J H Siewerdsen; R H Taylor
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A simple regularizer for B-spline nonrigid image registration that encourages local invertibility.

Authors:  Se Young Chun; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.856

Review 8.  The treatment of spinal metastases.

Authors:  Karl-Stefan Delank; Clemens Wendtner; Hans Theodor Eich; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Timing of surgical intervention in spinal trauma: what does the evidence indicate?

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Jefferson R Wilson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Generalized Least-Squares CT Reconstruction with Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Models.

Authors:  J Webster Stayman; Wojciech Zbijewski; Steven Tilley; Jeffrey Siewerdsen
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19
View more
  6 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; T De Silva; A Uneri; J Goerres; M Jacobson; M Ketcha; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J-P Wolinsky; J L Prince; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Intraoperative CT as a registration benchmark for intervertebral motion compensation in image-guided open spinal surgery.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; S Scott Lollis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  MIND Demons for MR-to-CT Deformable Image Registration In Image-Guided Spine Surgery.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; T De Silva; A Uneri; J-P Wolinsky; A J Khanna; G Kleinszig; S Vogt; J L Prince; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-18

4.  MIND Demons: Symmetric Diffeomorphic Deformable Registration of MR and CT for Image-Guided Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sureerat Reaungamornrat; Tharindu De Silva; Ali Uneri; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Akhil J Khanna; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Jerry L Prince; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A level-wise spine registration framework to account for large pose changes.

Authors:  Yunliang Cai; Shaoju Wu; Xiaoyao Fan; Jonathan Olson; Linton Evans; Scott Lollis; Sohail K Mirza; Keith D Paulsen; Songbai Ji
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy with guaranteed local rigidity constraints.

Authors:  Lars König; Alexander Derksen; Nils Papenberg; Benjamin Haas
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.