J Lee1, E de Louw, M Niemi, R Nelson, R G Mark, L A Celi, K J Mukamal, J Danziger. 1. Lab of Computational Physiology, Division of Health, Sciences and Technology, Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although the consequences of chronic fluid retention are well known, those of iatrogenic fluid retention that occurs during critical illness have not been fully determined. Therefore, we investigated the association between fluid balance and survival in a cohort of almost 16,000 individuals who survived an intensive care unit (ICU) stay in a large, urban, tertiary medical centre. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of fluid balance at ICU discharge and 90-day post-ICU survival. MEASUREMENTS: Associations between fluid balance during the ICU stay, determined from the electronic bedside record, and survival were tested using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for severity of critical illness. RESULTS: There were 1827 deaths in the first 90 days after ICU discharge. Compared with the lowest quartile of discharge fluid balance [median (interquartile range) -1.5 (-3.1, -0.7) L], the highest quartile [7.6 (5.7, 10.8) L] was associated with a 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.61)] higher adjusted risk of death. Fluid balance was not associated with outcome amongst individuals without congestive heart failure or renal dysfunction. Amongst patients with either comorbidity, however, fluid balance was strongly associated with outcome, with the highest quartile having a 55% (95% CI 1.24-1.95) higher adjusted risk of death than the lowest quartile. Isotonic fluid balance, defined as the difference between intravenous isotonic fluid administration and urine output, was similarly associated with 90-day outcomes. CONCLUSION: Positive fluid balance at the time of ICU discharge is associated with increased risk of death, after adjusting for markers of illness severity and chronic medical conditions, particularly in patients with underlying heart or kidney disease. Restoration of euvolaemia prior to discharge may improve survival after acute illness.
OBJECTIVE: Although the consequences of chronic fluid retention are well known, those of iatrogenic fluid retention that occurs during critical illness have not been fully determined. Therefore, we investigated the association between fluid balance and survival in a cohort of almost 16,000 individuals who survived an intensive care unit (ICU) stay in a large, urban, tertiary medical centre. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of fluid balance at ICU discharge and 90-day post-ICU survival. MEASUREMENTS: Associations between fluid balance during the ICU stay, determined from the electronic bedside record, and survival were tested using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for severity of critical illness. RESULTS: There were 1827 deaths in the first 90 days after ICU discharge. Compared with the lowest quartile of discharge fluid balance [median (interquartile range) -1.5 (-3.1, -0.7) L], the highest quartile [7.6 (5.7, 10.8) L] was associated with a 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.61)] higher adjusted risk of death. Fluid balance was not associated with outcome amongst individuals without congestive heart failure or renal dysfunction. Amongst patients with either comorbidity, however, fluid balance was strongly associated with outcome, with the highest quartile having a 55% (95% CI 1.24-1.95) higher adjusted risk of death than the lowest quartile. Isotonic fluid balance, defined as the difference between intravenous isotonic fluid administration and urine output, was similarly associated with 90-day outcomes. CONCLUSION: Positive fluid balance at the time of ICU discharge is associated with increased risk of death, after adjusting for markers of illness severity and chronic medical conditions, particularly in patients with underlying heart or kidney disease. Restoration of euvolaemia prior to discharge may improve survival after acute illness.
Authors: Stacey L Valentine; Anil Sapru; Renee A Higgerson; Phillip C Spinella; Heidi R Flori; Dionne A Graham; Molly Brett; Maureen Convery; LeeAnn M Christie; Laurie Karamessinis; Adrienne G Randolph Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ross P Martini; Steven Deem; Marcia Brown; Michael J Souter; N David Yanez; Stephen Daniel; Miriam M Treggiari Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: David T Selewski; Timothy T Cornell; Rebecca M Lombel; Neal B Blatt; Yong Y Han; Theresa Mottes; Mallika Kommareddi; David B Kershaw; Thomas P Shanley; Michael Heung Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Tal Mandelbaum; Joon Lee; Daniel J Scott; Roger G Mark; Atul Malhotra; Michael D Howell; Daniel Talmor Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Maartje C J Slagman; Femke Waanders; Marc H Hemmelder; Arend-Jan Woittiez; Wilbert M T Janssen; Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Gerjan Navis; Gozewijn D Laverman Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-07-26
Authors: Didier Payen; Anne Cornélie de Pont; Yasser Sakr; Claudia Spies; Konrad Reinhart; Jean Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Emma J de Louw; Pepijn O Sun; Joon Lee; Mengling Feng; Roger G Mark; Leo Anthony Celi; Kenneth J Mukamal; John Danziger Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen; André Luiz Nunes Gobatto; Lívia Maria Garcia Melro; Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Marcelo Park Journal: World J Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05-04
Authors: John Danziger; Ken Chen; Susan Cavender; Joon Lee; Mengling Feng; Roger G Mark; Kenneth J Mukamal; Leo Anthony Celi Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-05
Authors: Vikram Balakumar; Raghavan Murugan; Florentina E Sileanu; Paul Palevsky; Gilles Clermont; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: M Dustin Boone; Jennifer Massa; Ariel Mueller; Sayuri P Jinadasa; Joon Lee; Rishi Kothari; Daniel J Scott; Julie Callahan; Leo Anthony Celi; Michele R Hacker Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: F Garzotto; M Ostermann; D Martín-Langerwerf; M Sánchez-Sánchez; J Teng; R Robert; A Marinho; M E Herrera-Gutierrez; H J Mao; D Benavente; E Kipnis; A Lorenzin; D Marcelli; C Tetta; C Ronco Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 9.097