Vikram Balakumar1, Raghavan Murugan, Florentina E Sileanu, Paul Palevsky, Gilles Clermont, John A Kellum. 1. 1The Center for Critical Care Nephrology, CRISMA, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.2The Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.3The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.4Renal Section, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, exposure to positive fluid balance, compared with negative fluid balance, has been associated with mortality and impaired renal recovery. However, it is unclear whether positive and negative fluid balances are associated with poor outcome compared to patients with even fluid balance (euvolemia). In this study, we examined the association between exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, on 1-year mortality and renal recovery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight medical-surgical ICUs at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients admitted between July 2000 and October 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 18,084 patients, fluid balance was categorized as negative (< 0%), even (0% to < 5%), or positive (≥ 5%). Following propensity matching, positive fluid balance, compared with even or negative fluid balance, was associated with increased mortality (30.3% vs 21.1% vs 22%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using Gray's model, negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with lower short-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) but higher long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.16-1.22; p = 0.004). Conversely, positive fluid balance was associated with higher mortality throughout 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001), which was attenuated in those who received renal replacement therapy (positive fluid balance × renal replacement therapy interaction (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.43-0.89; p < 0.001). Of patients receiving renal replacement therapy, neither positive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.4) nor negative (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43-1.55) fluid balance was associated with renal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill patients, exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with higher 1-year mortality. This mortality risk associated with positive fluid balance, however, was attenuated by use of renal replacement therapy. We found no association between fluid balance and renal recovery.
OBJECTIVES: Among critically illpatients with acute kidney injury, exposure to positive fluid balance, compared with negative fluid balance, has been associated with mortality and impaired renal recovery. However, it is unclear whether positive and negative fluid balances are associated with poor outcome compared to patients with even fluid balance (euvolemia). In this study, we examined the association between exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, on 1-year mortality and renal recovery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight medical-surgical ICUs at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. PATIENTS: Critically illpatients admitted between July 2000 and October 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 18,084 patients, fluid balance was categorized as negative (< 0%), even (0% to < 5%), or positive (≥ 5%). Following propensity matching, positive fluid balance, compared with even or negative fluid balance, was associated with increased mortality (30.3% vs 21.1% vs 22%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using Gray's model, negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with lower short-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) but higher long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.16-1.22; p = 0.004). Conversely, positive fluid balance was associated with higher mortality throughout 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001), which was attenuated in those who received renal replacement therapy (positive fluid balance × renal replacement therapy interaction (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.43-0.89; p < 0.001). Of patients receiving renal replacement therapy, neither positive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.4) nor negative (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43-1.55) fluid balance was associated with renal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically illpatients, exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with higher 1-year mortality. This mortality risk associated with positive fluid balance, however, was attenuated by use of renal replacement therapy. We found no association between fluid balance and renal recovery.
Authors: Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rinaldo Bellomo; Alan Cass; Louise Cole; Simon Finfer; Martin Gallagher; Joanne Lee; Serigne Lo; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuiness; Robyn Norton; John Myburgh; Carlos Scheinkestel; Steve Su Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: David T Selewski; Timothy T Cornell; Rebecca M Lombel; Neal B Blatt; Yong Y Han; Theresa Mottes; Mallika Kommareddi; David B Kershaw; Thomas P Shanley; Michael Heung Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rajiv Saran; Yi Li; Bruce Robinson; John Ayanian; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Jennifer Bragg-Gresham; Joline T L Chen; Elizabeth Cope; Debbie Gipson; Kevin He; William Herman; Michael Heung; Richard A Hirth; Steven S Jacobsen; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy; Alan B Leichtman; Yee Lu; Miklos Z Molnar; Hal Morgenstern; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Ann M O'Hare; Ronald Pisoni; Brett Plattner; Friedrich K Port; Panduranga Rao; Connie M Rhee; Douglas E Schaubel; David T Selewski; Vahakn Shahinian; John J Sim; Peter Song; Elani Streja; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Francesca Tentori; Paul W Eggers; Lawrence Y C Agodoa; Kevin C Abbott Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sandra L Kane-Gill; Florentina E Sileanu; Raghavan Murugan; Gregory S Trietley; Steven M Handler; John A Kellum Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ron Wald; Robert R Quinn; Jin Luo; Ping Li; Damon C Scales; Muhammad M Mamdani; Joel G Ray Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 56.272