PURPOSE: In pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, fluid overload (FO) at initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been reported to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Previous studies have calculated FO based on daily fluid balance during ICU admission, which is labor intensive and error prone. We hypothesized that a weight-based definition of FO at CRRT initiation would correlate with the fluid balance method and prove predictive of outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center review of PICU patients requiring CRRT from July 2006 through February 2010 (n = 113). We compared the degree of FO at CRRT initiation using the standard fluid balance method versus methods based on patient weight changes assessed by both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The degree of fluid overload at CRRT initiation was significantly greater in nonsurvivors, irrespective of which method was used. The univariate odds ratio for PICU mortality per 1% increase in FO was 1.056 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.025, 1.087] by the fluid balance method, 1.044 (95% CI 1.019, 1.069) by the weight-based method using PICU admission weight, and 1.045 (95% CI 1.022, 1.07) by the weight-based method using hospital admission weight. On multivariate analyses, all three methods approached significance in predicting PICU survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that weight-based definitions of FO are useful in defining FO at CRRT initiation and are associated with increased mortality in a broad PICU patient population. This study provides evidence for a more practical weight-based definition of FO that can be used at the bedside.
PURPOSE: In pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, fluid overload (FO) at initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been reported to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Previous studies have calculated FO based on daily fluid balance during ICU admission, which is labor intensive and error prone. We hypothesized that a weight-based definition of FO at CRRT initiation would correlate with the fluid balance method and prove predictive of outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center review of PICU patients requiring CRRT from July 2006 through February 2010 (n = 113). We compared the degree of FO at CRRT initiation using the standard fluid balance method versus methods based on patient weight changes assessed by both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The degree of fluid overload at CRRT initiation was significantly greater in nonsurvivors, irrespective of which method was used. The univariate odds ratio for PICU mortality per 1% increase in FO was 1.056 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.025, 1.087] by the fluid balance method, 1.044 (95% CI 1.019, 1.069) by the weight-based method using PICU admission weight, and 1.045 (95% CI 1.022, 1.07) by the weight-based method using hospital admission weight. On multivariate analyses, all three methods approached significance in predicting PICU survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that weight-based definitions of FO are useful in defining FO at CRRT initiation and are associated with increased mortality in a broad PICU patient population. This study provides evidence for a more practical weight-based definition of FO that can be used at the bedside.
Authors: Carmen Fernández; Jesús López-Herce; Jose C Flores; Dolores Galaviz; Marta Rupérez; Kay B Brandstrup; Amaya Bustinza Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Stuart L Goldstein; Michael J G Somers; Michelle A Baum; Jordan M Symons; Patrick D Brophy; Douglas Blowey; Timothy E Bunchman; Cheryl Baker; Theresa Mottes; Nancy McAfee; Joni Barnett; Gloria Morrison; Kristine Rogers; James D Fortenberry Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jason A Foland; James D Fortenberry; Barry L Warshaw; Robert Pettignano; Robert K Merritt; Micheal L Heard; Kris Rogers; Chris Reid; April J Tanner; Kirk A Easley Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Rebecca M Lombel; Mallika Kommareddi; Theresa Mottes; David T Selewski; Yong Y Han; Debbie S Gipson; Katherine L Collins; Michael Heung Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Emma J de Louw; Pepijn O Sun; Joon Lee; Mengling Feng; Roger G Mark; Leo Anthony Celi; Kenneth J Mukamal; John Danziger Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Vikram Balakumar; Raghavan Murugan; Florentina E Sileanu; Paul Palevsky; Gilles Clermont; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Geoffrey M Fleming; Rashmi Sahay; Michael Zappitelli; Eileen King; David J Askenazi; Brian C Bridges; Matthew L Paden; David T Selewski; David S Cooper Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Matthew A Hazle; Robert J Gajarski; Sunkyung Yu; Janet Donohue; Neal B Blatt Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.624