Literature DB >> 23753235

Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: the effect of increasing fluid balance on mortality.

Farid Sadaka1, Mayrol Juarez2, Soophia Naydenov2, Jacklyn O'Brien2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether progressively increasing fluid balance after initial fluid resuscitation for septic shock is associated with increased mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the use of intravenous fluids in patients with septic shock in a large university affiliated hospital with 56 medical-surgical intensive care unit beds. We analyzed the data of 350 patients with septic shock who were managed according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Based on net fluid balance at 24 hours, we examined the results of increase in positive fluid balance on the risk of in-hospital mortality. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the amount of fluid balance by 24 hours, based on 6-L aliquots.
RESULTS: At 24 hours, the average fluid balance was +6.5 L. After correcting for age and sequential organ failure assessment score, a more positive fluid balance at 24 hours significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality. Using Cox proportional hazard analysis, excess 12-, 18-, and 24-L positive fluid balance had higher risk of mortality than those patients with a neutral to positive 6-L fluid balance (reference group). Adjusted hazard ratios, 1.519 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.353-1.685), 1.740 (95% CI, 1.467-2.013), and 1.620 (95% CI, 1.197-2.043), respectively, P < .05.
CONCLUSION: In patients with septic shock resuscitated according to current guidelines, a more positive fluid balance at 24 hours is associated with an increase in the risk of mortality. Optimal survival occurred at neutral fluid balance and up to 6-L positive fluid balance at 24 hours after the development of septic shock.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluid; mortality; resuscitation; sepsis; septic shock

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23753235     DOI: 10.1177/0885066613478899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  43 in total

1.  When sepsis affects the heart: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Clemente; Antonino Tuttolomondo; Daniela Colomba; Rosaria Pecoraro; Chiara Renda; Vittoriano Della Corte; Carlo Maida; Irene Simonetta; Antonio Pinto
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Increased incidence of diuretic use in critically ill obese patients.

Authors:  Emma J de Louw; Pepijn O Sun; Joon Lee; Mengling Feng; Roger G Mark; Leo Anthony Celi; Kenneth J Mukamal; John Danziger
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Cumulative Fluid Balance and Mortality in Septic Patients With or Without Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Javier A Neyra; Xilong Li; Fabrizio Canepa-Escaro; Beverley Adams-Huet; Robert D Toto; Jerry Yee; S Susan Hedayati
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: narrative review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Glenn Hernandez; Martin Dunser; Massimo Antonelli; Tim Baker; Jan Bakker; Jacques Duranteau; Sharon Einav; A B Johan Groeneveld; Tim Harris; Sameer Jog; Flavia R Machado; Mervyn Mer; M Ignacio Monge García; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  AME evidence series 001-The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and early identification of sepsis in the hospital.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Nathan J Smischney; Haibo Zhang; Sven Van Poucke; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Patrick M Honore; Win Sen Kuan; Juliet June Ray; Jiancang Zhou; You Shang; Yuetian Yu; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pietro Caironi; David Grimaldi; Stefan Hofer; George Dimopoulos; Marc Leone; Sang-Bum Hong; Mabrouk Bahloul; Laurent Argaud; Won Young Kim; Herbert D Spapen; Jose Rodolfo Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Liam Byrne; Frank van Haren
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Liberal Versus Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Early Septic Shock: Rationale for a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Matthew W Semler; Rinaldo Bellomo; Samuel M Brown; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Matthew C Exline; Adit A Ginde; Colin K Grissom; David R Janz; Alan E Jones; Kathleen D Liu; Stephen P J Macdonald; Chadwick D Miller; Pauline K Park; Lora A Reineck; Todd W Rice; Jay S Steingrub; Daniel Talmor; Donald M Yealy; Ivor S Douglas; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Impact of Intravenous Fluid Therapy on Survival Among Patients With Ebola Virus Disease: An International Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adam R Aluisio; Derrick Yam; Jillian L Peters; Daniel K Cho; Shiromi M Perera; Stephen B Kennedy; Moses Massaquoi; Foday Sahr; Michael A Smit; Tao Liu; Adam C Levine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Association between fluid balance and survival in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Lee; E de Louw; M Niemi; R Nelson; R G Mark; L A Celi; K J Mukamal; J Danziger
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Characteristics and progression of children with acute viral bronchiolitis subjected to mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Roberta Ferlini; Flávia Ohlweiler Pinheiro; Cinara Andreolio; Paulo Roberto Antonacci Carvalho; Jefferson Pedro Piva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.