Literature DB >> 26929343

Material heterogeneity in cancellous bone promotes deformation recovery after mechanical failure.

Ashley M Torres1, Jonathan B Matheny1, Tony M Keaveny2, David Taylor3, Clare M Rimnac4, Christopher J Hernandez5.   

Abstract

Many natural structures use a foam core and solid outer shell to achieve high strength and stiffness with relatively small amounts of mass. Biological foams, however, must also resist crack growth. The process of crack propagation within the struts of a foam is not well understood and is complicated by the foam microstructure. We demonstrate that in cancellous bone, the foam-like component of whole bones, damage propagation during cyclic loading is dictated not by local tissue stresses but by heterogeneity of material properties associated with increased ductility of strut surfaces. The increase in surface ductility is unexpected because it is the opposite pattern generated by surface treatments to increase fatigue life in man-made materials, which often result in reduced surface ductility. We show that the more ductile surfaces of cancellous bone are a result of reduced accumulation of advanced glycation end products compared with the strut interior. Damage is therefore likely to accumulate in strut centers making cancellous bone more tolerant of stress concentrations at strut surfaces. Hence, the structure is able to recover more deformation after failure and return to a closer approximation of its original shape. Increased recovery of deformation is a passive mechanism seen in biology for setting a broken bone that allows for a better approximation of initial shape during healing processes and is likely the most important mechanical function. Our findings suggest a previously unidentified biomimetic design strategy in which tissue level material heterogeneity in foams can be used to improve deformation recovery after failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced glycation end products; biomaterial; bone remodeling; cellular solid; fracture mechanics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929343      PMCID: PMC4801312          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520539113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Mechanical behavior of human trabecular bone after overloading.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; D L Kopperdahl
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Influence of nonenzymatic glycation on biomechanical properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  D Vashishth; G J Gibson; J I Khoury; M B Schaffler; J Kimura; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  An improved labelling technique for monitoring microcrack growth in compact bone.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Mineral heterogeneity affects predictions of intratrabecular stress and strain.

Authors:  G A P Renders; L Mulder; L J van Ruijven; G E J Langenbach; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Living with cracks: damage and repair in human bone.

Authors:  David Taylor; Jan G Hazenberg; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 7.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; F M Lambers; J Widjaja; C Chapa; C M Rimnac
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; X Shen; X Li; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  In vitro non-enzymatic ribation reduces post-yield strain accommodation in cortical bone.

Authors:  Thomas L Willett; Sibi Sutty; Anne Gaspar; Nick Avery; Marc Grynpas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bone-inspired microarchitectures achieve enhanced fatigue life.

Authors:  Ashley M Torres; Adwait A Trikanad; Cameron A Aubin; Floor M Lambers; Marysol Luna; Clare M Rimnac; Pablo Zavattieri; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Role of Matrix Composition in the Mechanical Behavior of Bone.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Amy Creecy; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ginu U Unnikrisnan; Amira I Hussein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 4.  Mechanical Characterization of Bone: State of the Art in Experimental Approaches-What Types of Experiments Do People Do and How Does One Interpret the Results?

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Animal Models of Bone Marrow Lesions in Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Andrew Bowen; David Shamritsky; Josue Santana; Ian Porter; Erica Feldman; Sarah L Pownder; Matthew F Koff; Kei Hayashi; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.