Literature DB >> 26522622

Finite element models predict the location of microdamage in cancellous bone following uniaxial loading.

M G Goff1, F M Lambers2, R M Sorna2, T M Keaveny3, C J Hernandez4.   

Abstract

High-resolution finite element models derived from micro-computed tomography images are often used to study the effects of trabecular microarchitecture and loading mode on tissue stress, but the degree to which existing finite element methods correctly predict the location of tissue failure is not well characterized. In the current study, we determined the relationship between the location of highly strained tissue, as determined from high-resolution finite element models, and the location of tissue microdamage, as determined from three-dimensional fluoroscopy imaging, which was performed after the microdamage was generated in-vitro by mechanical testing. Fourteen specimens of human vertebral cancellous bone were assessed (8 male donors, 2 female donors, 47-78 years of age). Regions of stained microdamage, were 50-75% more likely to form in highly strained tissue (principal strains exceeding 0.4%) than elsewhere, and generally the locations of the regions of microdamage were significantly correlated (p<0.05) with the locations of highly strained tissue. This spatial correlation was stronger for the largest regions of microdamage (≥1,000,000μm(3) in volume); 87% of large regions of microdamage were located near highly strained tissue. Together, these findings demonstrate that there is a strong correlation between regions of microdamage and regions of high strain in human cancellous bone, particularly for the biomechanically more important large instances of microdamage.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mechanics; Finite element model; Microdamage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26522622      PMCID: PMC4663152          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  Sensitivity of damage predictions to tissue level yield properties and apparent loading conditions.

Authors:  G L Niebur; J C Yuen; A J Burghardt; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Visualization of a phantom post-yield deformation process in cortical bone.

Authors:  Xuanhao Sun; Ji Hoon Jeon; John Blendell; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Trabecular shear stresses predict in vivo linear microcrack density but not diffuse damage in human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Fu J Hou; Traci Ciarelli; Deepak Vashishth; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Spatial correlations of trabecular bone microdamage with local stresses and strains using rigid image registration.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Oskar Skrinjar; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The effects of misalignment during in vivo loading of bone: techniques to detect the proximity of objects in three-dimensional models.

Authors:  M G Goff; K L Chang; E N Litts; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiutao Shi; X Sherry Liu; Xiang Wang; X Edward Guo; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The effects of tensile-compressive loading mode and microarchitecture on microdamage in human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Evgeniy V Tkachenko; Tony M Keaveny; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Theoretical bounds for the influence of tissue-level ductility on the apparent-level strength of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Shashank Nawathe; Frédéric Juillard; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shane; David Burr; Bo Abrahamsen; Robert A Adler; Thomas D Brown; Angela M Cheung; Felicia Cosman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Richard Dell; David W Dempster; Peter R Ebeling; Thomas A Einhorn; Harry K Genant; Piet Geusens; Klaus Klaushofer; Joseph M Lane; Fergus McKiernan; Ross McKinney; Alvin Ng; Jeri Nieves; Regis O'Keefe; Socrates Papapoulos; Tet Sen Howe; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Robert S Weinstein; Michael P Whyte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Microdamage caused by fatigue loading in human cancellous bone: relationship to reductions in bone biomechanical performance.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Clare M Rimnac; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Local and global microarchitecture is associated with different features of bone biomechanics.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Roux; Stéphanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Roland Chapurlat; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 2.  Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ginu U Unnikrisnan; Amira I Hussein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Determinants of bone damage: An ex-vivo study on porcine vertebrae.

Authors:  Mohammad J Mirzaali; Flavia Libonati; Davide Ferrario; Luca Rinaudo; Carmelo Messina; Fabio M Ulivieri; Bruno M Cesana; Matteo Strano; Laura Vergani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Application of subject-specific adaptive mechanical loading for bone healing in a mouse tail vertebral defect.

Authors:  Angad Malhotra; Matthias Walle; Graeme R Paul; Gisela A Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.