| Literature DB >> 24927368 |
Mookiah Saminathan1, Hui Yin Tan2, Chin Chin Sieo3, Norhani Abdullah4, Clemente Michael Vui Ling Wong5, Emilia Abdulmalek6, Yin Wan Ho7.
Abstract
Condensed tannins (CTs) form insoluble complexes with proteins and are able to protect them from degradation, which could lead to rumen bypass proteins. Depending on their degrees of polymerization (DP) and molecular weights, CT fractions vary in their capability to bind proteins. In this study, purified condensed tannins (CTs) from a Leucaena leucocephala hybrid were fractionated into five different molecular weight fractions. The structures of the CT fractions were investigated using 13C-NMR. The DP of the CT fractions were determined using a modified vanillin assay and their molecular weights were determined using Q-TOF LC-MS. The protein-binding affinities of the respective CT fractions were determined using a protein precipitation assay. The DP of the five CT fractions (fractions F1-F5) measured by the vanillin assay in acetic acid ranged from 4.86 to 1.56. The 13C-NMR results showed that the CT fractions possessed monomer unit structural heterogeneity. The number-average molecular weights (Mn) of the different fractions were 1265.8, 1028.6, 652.2, 562.2, and 469.6 for fractions F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, respectively. The b values representing the CT quantities needed to bind half of the maximum precipitable bovine serum albumin increased with decreasing molecular weight--from fraction F1 to fraction F5 with values of 0.216, 0.295, 0.359, 0.425, and 0.460, respectively. This indicated that higher molecular weight fractions of CTs from L. leucocephala have higher protein-binding affinities than those with lower molecular weights.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24927368 PMCID: PMC6270696 DOI: 10.3390/molecules19067990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of a flavan-3-ol monomer (A) and condensed tannins (B).
Figure 2Size exclusion chromatograms of CTs from L. leucocephala fractionated using Sephadex G-25. The detector was set to 350 nm and the elution time was over 200 min. Fractions were combined according to their absorbance.
Yields of purified and fractionated CTs from LLR by size exclusion chromatography.
| Sample | Yield (% DM) | SEM |
|---|---|---|
| Purified CTs | 20.7 | 1.21 |
| Fraction 1 | 10.1 | 0.62 |
| Fraction 2 | 74.9 | 2.46 |
| Fraction 3 | 8.5 | 0.57 |
| Fraction 4 | 4.2 | 0.34 |
| Fraction 5 | 2.3 | 0.21 |
Based on crude CTs. Based on purified CTs. SEM: Standard error of the mean.
Figure 3Standard curve (A) of the reaction of catechin with vanillin in glacial acetic acid and sample curves (B) of the reaction of CT fractions with vanillin in glacial acetic acid. The standard deviations (SD) for catechin (A) and samples (B) in the vanillin assay were below 0.02.
Estimated DP of CT fractions from LLR by the modified vanillin assay and linear regression statistics of the absorption spectrum curves.
| CT Fraction | Slope | Intercept | DP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.375 | 0.017 | 0.99 | 4.86 |
| F2 | 0.417 | 0.014 | 0.98 | 3.60 |
| F3 | 0.562 | 0.028 | 0.99 | 2.50 |
| F4 | 0.622 | 0.025 | 0.99 | 2.34 |
| F5 | 0.651 | 0.029 | 0.98 | 1.56 |
– Means within a column with no common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05). r2: Coefficient of determination.
Figure 413C-NMR (125 MHz) spectra of CT fractions F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 from LLR in DMSO-d6; DMSO-d6, dimethyl-d6 sulfoxide. Identity of the structures: R1=R2=H, propelargonidin (PP); R1=OH, R2=H, procyanidin (PC); and R1=R2=OH, prodelphinidin (PD).
PD to PC ratios of CT fractions.
| Fraction | PD % | PC % | PD/PC ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 67.3 | 32.7 | 2.06 |
| F2 | 64.8 | 35.2 | 1.84 |
| F3 | 62.0 | 38.0 | 1.63 |
| F4 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.00 |
| F5 | 58.0 | 42.0 | 1.38 |
PD: Prodelphindin; PC: Procyanidin.
Composition of the five fractions of CTs identified by Q-TOF LC-MS spectra.
| CT | Observed Mass ( | Ion Detected | Calculated Mass (Da) | Possible Assignments | DP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraction 1 | Peak 1 | 1223.2250 | 4.50 | [M+Na]+ | 1200 | 304*3 + 288 + 2 | 4 |
| Peak 2 | 1241.2910 | 2.00 | [M+Na]+ | 1218 | 304*4 + 2 | 4 | |
| Peak 3 | 1291.7166 | 3.25 | [M+H]+ | 1290 | 288*3 + 272 + 152 + 2 | 4 | |
| Peak 4 | 1443.2680 | 1.00 | [M+ H]+ | 1442 | 288*5 + 2 | 5 | |
| CT av | 1265.8 | ||||||
| Fraction 2 | Peak 1 | 785.5299 | 0.50 | [M+Na]+ | 762 | 304*2 + 152 + 2 | 2 |
| Peak 5 | 747.5016 | 0.90 | [M+H]+ | 746 | (288 + 304 + 152 + 2) | 2 | |
| Peak 4 | 856.5647 | 0.15 | [M+Na]+ | 832 | (272*2 + 288 + 2) – 2H | 3 | |
| Peak 4 | 858.5647 | 0.15 | [M+Na]+ | 834 | 272*2 + 288 + 2 | 3 | |
| Peak 5 | 1067.226 | 0.15 | [M+H]+ | 1066 | 304*3 + 152 + 2 | 3 | |
| Peak 6 | 1241.295 | 2.00 | [M+Na]+ | 1218 | 304*4 + 2 | 4 | |
| CT av | 1028.6 | ||||||
| Fraction 3 | Peak 1 | 611.3065 | 0.25 | [M+H]+ | 610 | 304*2 + 2 | 2 |
| Peak 2 | 601.1330 | 0.45 | [M+Na]+ | 578 | 288*2 + 2 | 2 | |
| Peak 3 | 633.4391 | 0.25 | [M+Na]+ | 610 | 304*2 + 2 | 2 | |
| Peak 4 | 727.4915 | 0.27 | [M+H]+ | 726 | (288*2 + 152 + 2) – 2H | 2 | |
| Peak 5 | 769.5189 | 0.15 | [M+Na]+ | 746 | 288 + 304 + 152 + 2 | 3 | |
| CT av | 652.2 | ||||||
| Fraction 4 | Peak 1 | 547.3872 | 0.35 | [M+H]+ | 546 | 272*2 + 2 | 2 |
| Peak 2 | 563.4121 | 0.30 | [M+H]+ | 562 | 288 + 272 + 2 | 2 | |
| Peak 3 | 579.4142 | 0.32 | [M+H]+ | 578 | 288*2 + 2 | 2 | |
| CT av | 562.2 | ||||||
| Fraction 5 | Peak 1 | 481.2794 | 0.25 | [M+Na]+ | 458 | 304 + 152 + 2 | 1 |
| Peak 2 | 482.3310 | 0.60 | [M+Na]+ | 459 | 304 + 152 + 2 | 1 | |
| Peak 3 | 444.3079 | 0.30 | [M+H]+ | 443 | 288 + 152 + 2 | 1 | |
| Peak 4 | 461.3260 | 2.20 | [M+Na]+ | 438 | (288 + 152 + 2) – 2H | 1 | |
| Peak 5 | 479.3260 | 2.20 | [M+Na]+ | 578 | 288*2 + 2 | 2 | |
| Peak 6 | 611.4354 | 0.24 | [M+H]+ | 610 | 304*2 + 2 | 2 | |
| CT av | 469.6 | ||||||
I = absolute intensity (× 104). 304, 288, 272,152 and * represent the calculated molecular weights of (epi)gallocatechin, (epi)catechin/(epi)robinetinidol, (epi)fisetinidol/(epi)afzelechin, and galloyl derivatives, respectively. DP, degree of polymerization. CTs number-average molecular weights (Mn) was calculated with the equation Mn = (Σ(m/z))/(ΣI).
Figure 5Protein-binding affinities of CT fractions of different molecular weights from LLR. The Y-axis represents the bonded bovine serum albumin (BSA) values, and the X‑axis represents different CT amounts. The standard deviations (SD) for all the CT fractions in the protein binding assay were below 0.002.
Protein-binding affinities of CT fractions of different molecular weights using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as reference protein.
| Fraction | Molecular weight (Da) | |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | 1265.80 | 0.216 ± 0.025 |
| F2 | 1028.60 | 0.295 ± 0.036 |
| F3 | 652.20 | 0.359 ± 0.049 |
| F4 | 562.20 | 0.425 ± 0.022 |
| F5 | 469.60 | 0.460 ± 0.048 |
– Means within a column with no common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05). 1 b value is the CT quantity (mg) that is needed to bind half of the maximum precipitable BSA. It is used to denote the protein-binding affinity of CTs in this study. When b value is smaller, the protein-binding affinity of the CTs is stronger.