Literature DB >> 31783168

Advantages of Radiation Therapy Simulation with 0.35 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stereotactic Ablation of Spinal Metastases.

Benjamin Spieler1, Stuart E Samuels1, Ricardo Llorente1, Raphael Yechieli1, John Chetley Ford1, Eric A Mellon2.   

Abstract

The hybrid 0.35T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiation therapy system functions in part as a simulation platform for treatment planning. We have found that the images generated are particularly helpful for planning of stereotactic radiation therapy for spinal metastases. Advantages include the following: (1) Low-field MRI mitigates magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by spinal hardware. (2) Volumetric pulse sequence provides isotropic images for improved target delineation. (3) Wide-bore MRI in the radiation oncology department allows for easy simulation in treatment position for accurate fusion across imaging modalities. (4) When patients are treated on the MRI and radiation therapy hybrid device, adaptive radiation therapy is available for special situations to avoid mobile organs at risk.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31783168      PMCID: PMC7247919          DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  24 in total

1.  Comprehensive MRI simulation methodology using a dedicated MRI scanner in radiation oncology for external beam radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Beth Erickson; Chris Schultz; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Daekeon Lim; Eunju Kim; Sungjun Kim; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Simulated Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease of the Abdomen and Central Thorax: Characterization of Potential Advantages.

Authors:  Lauren Henke; Rojano Kashani; Deshan Yang; Tianyu Zhao; Olga Green; Lindsey Olsen; Vivian Rodriguez; H Omar Wooten; H Harold Li; Yanle Hu; Jeffrey Bradley; Clifford Robinson; Parag Parikh; Jeff Michalski; Sasa Mutic; Jeffrey R Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tumor control outcomes after hypofractionated and single-dose stereotactic image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for extracranial metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Carlo Greco; Robert Motzer; Juan Martin Magsanoc; Xin Pei; Michael Lovelock; Jim Mechalakos; Joan Zatcky; Zvi Fuks; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Comparison of onboard low-field magnetic resonance imaging versus onboard computed tomography for anatomy visualization in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Camille E Noel; Parag J Parikh; Christopher R Spencer; Olga L Green; Yanle Hu; Sasa Mutic; Jeffrey R Olsen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Pain control by image-guided radiosurgery for solitary spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Samuel Ryu; Ryan Jin; Jian-Yue Jin; Qing Chen; Jack Rock; Joseph Anderson; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Dosimetric effect of translational and rotational errors for patients undergoing image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  He Wang; Almon Shiu; Congjun Wang; Jennifer O'Daniel; Anita Mahajan; Shiao Woo; Praimakorn Liengsawangwong; Radhe Mohan; Eric L Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.

Authors:  P Stradiotti; A Curti; G Castellazzi; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging offers potential for measuring tibial component migration.

Authors:  F F Schröder; N J J Verdonschot; B Ten Haken; A Peters; A J H Vochteloo; D F M Pakvis; R Huis In't Veld
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-01-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Brain and Spine Tumors.

Authors:  Danilo Maziero; Michael W Straza; John C Ford; Joseph A Bovi; Tejan Diwanji; Radka Stoyanova; Eric S Paulson; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.